From: "Andy Willis" <cwmm-dev@2rosenthals.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <list-911426@2rosenthals.com> <list-911447@2rosenthals.com>
In-Reply-To: <list-911447@2rosenthals.com>
Date: Wed, 22 Jul 2020 07:33:17 -0500
Message-ID: <CA+WeAq3mL1Q6chSnEH2MP-sLSWmdPhYgG3Mu+mPiTdz0n9WGiA@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [cwmm-dev] Proposed sync merge of TW localization into v2.9 branch
To: CWMM Developers Mailing List <cwmm-dev@2rosenthals.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="0000000000006620da05ab06f274"

--0000000000006620da05ab06f274
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"

On Wed, Jul 22, 2020, 01:05 Steven Levine <cwmm-dev@2rosenthals.com> wrote:

> In <list-911426@2rosenthals.com>, on 07/22/20
>    at 01:06 AM, "Lewis" <cwmm-dev@2rosenthals.com> said:
>
> Hi Lewis,
>
> >Speaking of which... Are there enough loose makefiles floating around the
> > repo? Egad. It seems that every language has a makefile for something
> >which  could have been done with a single file a level or two above which
> >was not  NLV-specific. Oh, well. It's a process.
>
> This is exactly how the xwp repo does NLVs.  It's a style I prefer.  A
> project that insists on doing everything from a single top-level makefile
> is probably a project I'm not terribly interested in working on.
>
> When I need to make a small change to some file in some subdirectory, I
> prefer to be able to drop into the directory and type make and be done
> with it.  I don't care to be forced to wait for a top-level make file to
> figure out that 99% of the code does not need to be rebuilt.
>
This is my preference as well.

>

--0000000000006620da05ab06f274
Content-Type: text/html; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

<div dir=3D"auto"><div><div class=3D"gmail_quote"><div dir=3D"ltr" class=3D=
"gmail_attr">On Wed, Jul 22, 2020, 01:05 Steven Levine &lt;<a href=3D"mailt=
o:cwmm-dev@2rosenthals.com">cwmm-dev@2rosenthals.com</a>&gt; wrote:<br></di=
v><blockquote class=3D"gmail_quote" style=3D"margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:=
1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">In &lt;<a href=3D"mailto:list-911426@2rose=
nthals.com" target=3D"_blank" rel=3D"noreferrer">list-911426@2rosenthals.co=
m</a>&gt;, on 07/22/20<br>
=C2=A0 =C2=A0at 01:06 AM, &quot;Lewis&quot; &lt;<a href=3D"mailto:cwmm-dev@=
2rosenthals.com" target=3D"_blank" rel=3D"noreferrer">cwmm-dev@2rosenthals.=
com</a>&gt; said:<br>
<br>
Hi Lewis,<br>
<br>
&gt;Speaking of which... Are there enough loose makefiles floating around t=
he<br>
&gt; repo? Egad. It seems that every language has a makefile for something<=
br>
&gt;which=C2=A0 could have been done with a single file a level or two abov=
e which<br>
&gt;was not=C2=A0 NLV-specific. Oh, well. It&#39;s a process.<br>
<br>
This is exactly how the xwp repo does NLVs.=C2=A0 It&#39;s a style I prefer=
.=C2=A0 A<br>
project that insists on doing everything from a single top-level makefile<b=
r>
is probably a project I&#39;m not terribly interested in working on.<br>
<br>
When I need to make a small change to some file in some subdirectory, I<br>
prefer to be able to drop into the directory and type make and be done<br>
with it.=C2=A0 I don&#39;t care to be forced to wait for a top-level make f=
ile to<br>
figure out that 99% of the code does not need to be rebuilt.<br></blockquot=
e></div></div><div dir=3D"auto">This is my preference as well.</div><div di=
r=3D"auto"><div class=3D"gmail_quote"><blockquote class=3D"gmail_quote" sty=
le=3D"margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">
</blockquote></div></div></div>

--0000000000006620da05ab06f274--