Archivovaná správa #1012 diskusnej skupiny ecs-isp@2rosenthals.com

Od: "Massimo S." <ecs-isp@2rosenthals.com> Celá hlavi?ka
Nedekódovaná správa
Hlavi?ka: Re: [eCS-ISP] ClamAV (0.103.10) perfomances
Dátum: Wed, 6 Nov 2024 11:44:13 +0100
Komu: eCS ISP Mailing List <ecs-isp@2rosenthals.com>



Il 06/11/2024 07:29, Steven Levine ha scritto:
In <list-11206750@2rosenthals.com>, on 11/05/24
    at 08:41 PM, "Massimo S." <ecs-isp@2rosenthals.com> said:

Hi,

doing all the tests i've found "strange" perfomances

Not so strange if you use the available tools o understand what clamscan
is doing.

Try it with --verbose --debug and this should answer most of you
questions.

--verbose generate the same output


clamscan -i myemail.msg
(myemail.msg is 46.525 bytes)

one minute to scan a 46KB file?..

It appears you are ignoring the 450MB of signature files.

here in total, with more scam and phish DBs, are 372.511K

That said your
VM seems quite sluggish.  A similar run here  using

   [d:\tmp]timer on & t_clamscan.cmd & timer off

reports

   Timer 1 off: 22:35:09  Elapsed: 0:00:21.28

This is on an old-ish MB with SATA drives and with the --verbose --debug
switch options which will slow things down.

Without these options, the reported duration is a bit better

   Timer 1 off: 22:42:01  Elapsed: 0:00:19.32

Steven

in config.sys i have

BASEDEV=DANIS506.ADD /!BIOS
BASEDEV=OS2AHCI.ADD

maybe these drivers could slow down I/O?
(OS is eCS 2.2b + AN drv pack but not a new version)

do clamscan benefit of multi-core environment (6 cores)?

acpi.psd

Revision:        3.23.10
Date/Time:       7 Sep 2018 19:02:03

storage setup on the vbox is IDE IHC6
and use host cache
this should improve performances in general

massimo


Prihlási?: Nap??a?, Súhrn, Index.
Odhlási?
Mail na ListMastera