| Fra: |
"Massimo S." <ecs-isp@2rosenthals.com> |
Full Headers
Undecoded message |
| Emne: |
Re: [eCS-ISP] ClamAV (0.103.10) perfomances |
| Dato: |
Wed, 6 Nov 2024 11:44:13 +0100 |
| Til: |
eCS ISP Mailing List <ecs-isp@2rosenthals.com> |
|
|---|
Il 06/11/2024 07:29, Steven Levine ha scritto:
In <list-11206750@2rosenthals.com>, on 11/05/24
at 08:41 PM, "Massimo S." <ecs-isp@2rosenthals.com> said:
Hi,
doing all the tests i've found "strange" perfomances
Not so strange if you use the available tools o understand what clamscan
is doing.
Try it with --verbose --debug and this should answer most of you
questions.
--verbose generate the same output
clamscan -i myemail.msg
(myemail.msg is 46.525 bytes)
one minute to scan a 46KB file?..
It appears you are ignoring the 450MB of signature files.
here in total, with more scam and phish DBs, are 372.511K
That said your
VM seems quite sluggish. A similar run here using
[d:\tmp]timer on & t_clamscan.cmd & timer off
reports
Timer 1 off: 22:35:09 Elapsed: 0:00:21.28
This is on an old-ish MB with SATA drives and with the --verbose --debug
switch options which will slow things down.
Without these options, the reported duration is a bit better
Timer 1 off: 22:42:01 Elapsed: 0:00:19.32
Steven
in config.sys i have
BASEDEV=DANIS506.ADD /!BIOS
BASEDEV=OS2AHCI.ADD
maybe these drivers could slow down I/O?
(OS is eCS 2.2b + AN drv pack but not a new version)
do clamscan benefit of multi-core environment (6 cores)?
acpi.psd
Revision: 3.23.10
Date/Time: 7 Sep 2018 19:02:03
storage setup on the vbox is IDE IHC6
and use host cache
this should improve performances in general
massimo
|