From: "Massimo S." <ecs-isp@2rosenthals.com>
Reply-To: ml@ecomstation.it
Subject: Re: [eCS-ISP] [BULK] [eCS-ISP] Bind 9.11.20
To: eCS ISP Mailing List <ecs-isp@2rosenthals.com>
References: <list-880428@2rosenthals.com> <list-880471@2rosenthals.com>
Organization: eComStation dot it
Message-ID: <91560f12-ba92-abf0-b296-bffd337f8bf6@ecomstation.it>
Date: Tue, 14 Jul 2020 10:15:38 +0200
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (OS/2; U; Warp 4.5; it-IT; rv:1.7.13) Gecko/20060424
 Thunderbird/1.0.8 Mnenhy/0.7.4.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <list-880471@2rosenthals.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed
Content-Language: it-IT
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit

just for info

i'm using 9.11.10
since other build i tried had the cpu load issue

massimo

Il 13/07/2020 18:35, Lewis G Rosenthal ha scritto:
> Hi, Dan...
> 
> On 07/13/20 12:01 pm, Dan Napier wrote:
>> Hello Friends
>>
>> Did I miss something, I seem to be way ahead of the curve.  Running 9.12.4   I am not a Math 
>> Major, so I might be wrong, but isn’t 9.11.20 a lower rev?
>> 9.12.4 seems to run dandy, reports ip4 and ip6 addresses, does not hog cpu.  Did I do 
>> something wrong?
>>
> 
> As you will note here:
> 
> https://bind.isc.org/
> 
> 9.11 is an ESV (Extended Service Release). 9.11.20 is indeed newer than 9.12.4.
> 
> BIND 9.12.4 was a maintenance release, specifically to address issues disclosed in 
> CVE-2018-5744, CVE-2018-5745, and CVE-2019-6465.
> 
> 9.11.20, OTOH, addresses all security issues up through CVE-2020-8619:
> 
> https://gitlab.isc.org/isc-projects/bind9/-/blob/v9_11/README.md
> 
> Not every higher version number necessarily denotes a *newer* or more secure one. 9.12 was a 
> development branch; 9.11 is a stable one.
> 
> 9.16 is current, and will eventually become an ESV (I believe), so at some point, that should 
> become our target.
> 
> GL HTH
>