| From: |
"Massimo S." <ecs-isp@2rosenthals.com> |
Full Headers
Undecoded message |
| Subject: |
Re: [eCS-ISP] [BULK] [eCS-ISP] Bind 9.11.20 |
| Date: |
Tue, 14 Jul 2020 10:15:38 +0200 |
| To: |
eCS ISP Mailing List <ecs-isp@2rosenthals.com> |
|
|---|
just for info
i'm using 9.11.10
since other build i tried had the cpu load issue
massimo
Il 13/07/2020 18:35, Lewis G Rosenthal ha scritto:
Hi, Dan...
On 07/13/20 12:01 pm, Dan Napier wrote:
Hello Friends
Did I miss something, I seem to be way ahead of the curve. Running 9.12.4 I am not a Math Major, so I might be wrong, but isn’t 9.11.20 a lower rev?
9.12.4 seems to run dandy, reports ip4 and ip6 addresses, does not hog cpu. Did I do something wrong?
As you will note here:
https://bind.isc.org/
9.11 is an ESV (Extended Service Release). 9.11.20 is indeed newer than 9.12.4.
BIND 9.12.4 was a maintenance release, specifically to address issues disclosed in CVE-2018-5744, CVE-2018-5745, and CVE-2019-6465.
9.11.20, OTOH, addresses all security issues up through CVE-2020-8619:
https://gitlab.isc.org/isc-projects/bind9/-/blob/v9_11/README.md
Not every higher version number necessarily denotes a *newer* or more secure one. 9.12 was a development branch; 9.11 is a stable one.
9.16 is current, and will eventually become an ESV (I believe), so at some point, that should become our target.
GL HTH
|