|Mailing List firstname.lastname@example.org Archived Message #105||back to list|
just for info
i'm using 9.11.10
since other build i tried had the cpu load issue
Il 13/07/2020 18:35, Lewis G Rosenthal ha scritto:
On 07/13/20 12:01 pm, Dan Napier wrote:
Did I miss something, I seem to be way ahead of the curve. Running 9.12.4 I am not a Math Major, so I might be wrong, but isn’t 9.11.20 a lower rev?
9.12.4 seems to run dandy, reports ip4 and ip6 addresses, does not hog cpu. Did I do something wrong?
As you will note here:
9.11 is an ESV (Extended Service Release). 9.11.20 is indeed newer than 9.12.4.
BIND 9.12.4 was a maintenance release, specifically to address issues disclosed in CVE-2018-5744, CVE-2018-5745, and CVE-2019-6465.
9.11.20, OTOH, addresses all security issues up through CVE-2020-8619:
Not every higher version number necessarily denotes a *newer* or more secure one. 9.12 was a development branch; 9.11 is a stable one.
9.16 is current, and will eventually become an ESV (I believe), so at some point, that should become our target.
This message is sent to you because you are subscribed to
the mailing list <email@example.com>.
To unsubscribe, E-mail to: <firstname.lastname@example.org>
To switch to the DIGEST mode, E-mail to <email@example.com>
To switch to the INDEX mode, E-mail to <firstname.lastname@example.org>
Send administrative queries to <email@example.com>
To subscribe (new addresses), E-mail to: <firstname.lastname@example.org> and reply to the confirmation email.
Web archives are publicly available at: http://lists.2rosenthals.com
This list is hosted by Rosenthal & Rosenthal, LLC
P.O. Box 281, Deer Park, NY 11729-0281. Non-
electronic communications related to content
contained in these messages should be directed
to the above address. (CAN-SPAM Act of 2003)
Mail to ListMaster