just for info

i'm using 9.11.10
since other build i tried had the cpu load issue

massimo

Il 13/07/2020 18:35, Lewis G Rosenthal ha scritto:

Hi, Dan...

On 07/13/20 12:01 pm, Dan Napier wrote:

Hello Friends

Did I miss something, I seem to be way ahead of the curve.  Running 9.12.4   I am not a Math Major, so I might be wrong, but isn’t 9.11.20 a lower rev?
9.12.4 seems to run dandy, reports ip4 and ip6 addresses, does not hog cpu.  Did I do something wrong?

As you will note here:

https://bind.isc.org/

9.11 is an ESV (Extended Service Release). 9.11.20 is indeed newer than 9.12.4.

BIND 9.12.4 was a maintenance release, specifically to address issues disclosed in CVE-2018-5744, CVE-2018-5745, and CVE-2019-6465.

9.11.20, OTOH, addresses all security issues up through CVE-2020-8619:

https://gitlab.isc.org/isc-projects/bind9/-/blob/v9_11/README.md

Not every higher version number necessarily denotes a *newer* or more secure one. 9.12 was a development branch; 9.11 is a stable one.

9.16 is current, and will eventually become an ESV (I believe), so at some point, that should become our target.

GL HTH

=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
This message is sent to you because you are subscribed to
  the mailing list <ecs-isp@2rosenthals.com>.
To unsubscribe, E-mail to: <ecs-isp-off@2rosenthals.com>
To switch to the DIGEST mode, E-mail to <ecs-isp-digest@2rosenthals.com>
To switch to the INDEX mode, E-mail to <ecs-isp-index@2rosenthals.com>
Send administrative queries to  <ecs-isp-request@2rosenthals.com>
To subscribe (new addresses), E-mail to: <ecs-isp-on@2rosenthals.com> and reply to the confirmation email.
Web archives are publicly available at: http://lists.2rosenthals.com

This list is hosted by Rosenthal & Rosenthal, LLC
P.O. Box 281, Deer Park, NY 11729-0281. Non-
electronic communications related to content
contained in these messages should be directed
to the above address. (CAN-SPAM Act of 2003)

=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=