From: "Massimo S." <ecs-isp@2rosenthals.com>
Reply-To: ml@ecomstation.it
Subject: Re: [eCS-ISP] [BULK] [eCS-ISP] Bind 9.11.20
To: eCS ISP Mailing List <ecs-isp@2rosenthals.com>
References: <list-890714@2rosenthals.com>
Organization: eComStation dot it
Message-ID: <6ffa0d54-1b4f-8cda-601d-8300cd88d7d4@ecomstation.it>
Date: Tue, 14 Jul 2020 20:35:00 +0200
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (OS/2; U; Warp 4.5; it-IT; rv:1.7.13) Gecko/20060424
 Thunderbird/1.0.8 Mnenhy/0.7.4.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <list-890714@2rosenthals.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed
Content-Language: it-IT
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit



Il 14/07/2020 20:03, Steven Levine ha scritto:
> In <list-890052@2rosenthals.com>, on 07/14/20
>     at 06:39 PM, "Paul Smedley" <ecs-isp@2rosenthals.com> said:
> 
> Hi Paul,
> 
>>  From my original post "I think I worked out the problems with bind
>> sucking 100% CPU.".....
> 
> We live in a multi-verse :-)
> 
> Is there any possibility that this issue is in any way related to the 100%
> utilization that Massimo sometimes sees for stunnel?
> 
> My current guess on the stunnel issue is that there is a select() loop
> that needs to be throttled.  However, I am still waiting to Massimo to be
> ready for me to test this theory on his system, via a HelpDesk session.
> 
> Steven

i'm always ready :)

massimo


-- 
This email was Anti Virus checked by Astaro Security Gateway. http://www.sophos.com