Gönderen: |
"Dan Napier" <ecs-isp@2rosenthals.com> |
Tam Başlıklar Çözülmemiş İleti |
Konu: |
RE: [eCS-ISP] [BULK] [eCS-ISP] Bind 9.11.20 |
Tarih: |
Tue, 14 Jul 2020 16:48:49 -0700 |
Alacak: |
"eCS ISP Mailing List" <ecs-isp@2rosenthals.com> |
|
---|
Paul I just installed the 9.11 Porsche it does report ipv6 even in the OS2 command line The server is reporting ipv6 addresses, so I guess if the system is able to do with it it runs. So far I have not seen any 100 CPU usage. I will keep a close watch. Thanks for all your effort. Dan From: eCS ISP Mailing List [mailto:ecs-isp@2rosenthals.com] Sent: Monday, July 13, 2020 3:02 PM To: eCS ISP Mailing List <ecs-isp@2rosenthals.com> Subject: Re: [eCS-ISP] [BULK] [eCS-ISP] Bind 9.11.20 Hi Dan and Lewis, In addition to Lewis's comments - as I recall - newer bind versions don't provide the options of disabling ipv6 support - so we need to provide enough stubs of ipv6 headers to let it compile and work. I did this for openvpn (which similarly doesn't give an option to disable ipv6) - but ironically, it was this added header support that was causing the 100% cpu usage with Bind 9.11.x. For the above reasons, I focussed on maintaining 9.11.x as this is EOL December 2021 - which gives us plenty of time to come up with a solution for the next ESV version. Hi, Dan...
On 07/13/20 12:01 pm, Dan Napier wrote: > Hello Friends > > Did I miss something, I seem to be way ahead of the curve. Running 9.12.4 I am not a Math Major, so I might be wrong, but isn’t 9.11.20 a lower rev? > 9.12.4 seems to run dandy, reports ip4 and ip6 addresses, does not hog cpu. Did I do something wrong? >
As you will note here:
https://bind.isc.org/
9.11 is an ESV (Extended Service Release). 9.11.20 is indeed newer than 9.12.4.
BIND 9.12.4 was a maintenance release, specifically to address issues disclosed in CVE-2018-5744, CVE-2018-5745, and CVE-2019-6465.
9.11.20, OTOH, addresses all security issues up through CVE-2020-8619:
https://gitlab.isc.org/isc-projects/bind9/-/blob/v9_11/README.md
Not every higher version number necessarily denotes a *newer* or more secure one. 9.12 was a development branch; 9.11 is a stable one.
9.16 is current, and will eventually become an ESV (I believe), so at some point, that should become our target.
GL HTH
-- Lewis ------------------------------------------------------------- Lewis G Rosenthal, CNA, CLP, CLE, CWTS, EA Rosenthal & Rosenthal, LLC www.2rosenthals.com visit my IT blog www.2rosenthals.net/wordpress -------------------------------------------------------------
=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-= This message is sent to you because you are subscribed to the mailing list <ecs-isp@2rosenthals.com>. To unsubscribe, E-mail to: <ecs-isp-off@2rosenthals.com> To switch to the DIGEST mode, E-mail to <ecs-isp-digest@2rosenthals.com> To switch to the INDEX mode, E-mail to <ecs-isp-index@2rosenthals.com> Send administrative queries to <ecs-isp-request@2rosenthals.com> To subscribe (new addresses), E-mail to: <ecs-isp-on@2rosenthals.com> and reply to the confirmation email. Web archives are publicly available at: http://lists.2rosenthals.com
This list is hosted by Rosenthal & Rosenthal, LLC P.O. Box 281, Deer Park, NY 11729-0281. Non- electronic communications related to content contained in these messages should be directed to the above address. (CAN-SPAM Act of 2003)
=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
--
--
This email was Anti Virus checked by Astaro Security Gateway. http://www.sophos.com
|