From: "Steven Levine" Received: from [192.168.100.201] (HELO mail.2rosenthals.com) by 2rosenthals.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 5.4.10) with ESMTP id 11570280 for ecs-isp@2rosenthals.com; Wed, 25 Dec 2024 00:46:20 -0500 Received: from secmgr-va.2rosenthals.com ([50.73.8.217]:51839 helo=mail2.2rosenthals.com) by mail.2rosenthals.com with esmtps (TLS1.2) tls TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (Exim 4.97.1) (envelope-from ) id 1tQKDi-000000000fH-1jYX for ecs-isp@2rosenthals.com; Wed, 25 Dec 2024 00:46:10 -0500 Received: from mta-101a.earthlink-vadesecure.net ([51.81.61.60]:38669) by mail2.2rosenthals.com with esmtps (TLS1.2) tls TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (Exim 4.97.1) (envelope-from ) id 1tQKDY-000000005gl-0oCS for ecs-isp@2rosenthals.com; Wed, 25 Dec 2024 00:46:00 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; bh=8gIL1nt11jvPAMvSg+xYkKk5fSDK/RZinRRyXK 4n11M=; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=earthlink.net; h=from:reply-to:subject: date:to:cc:resent-date:resent-from:resent-to:resent-cc:in-reply-to: references:list-id:list-help:list-unsubscribe:list-unsubscribe-post: list-subscribe:list-post:list-owner:list-archive; q=dns/txt; s=dk12062016; t=1735105559; x=1735710359; b=ZGmUacjaWRSDyReSCo5AI3+OGK0 JSX8m9bi2BAirqjAq6syyONhk28VNUkWhdLkFUNi89CuYkYpWhESOhb0oN4DAgYFG1X/vNl WH1HHkslhjUam7i4VMiU7VO0yGHPC4C1+EhRbnLnbCnsXto3E7KDBx6rANe6c1FvLqZNOyB pZ/l/1LQVytG98/kKNXtUpuMjp09Xhwu/8JQN5qizA+lEw29Bxs3cvIxUQXUwRnOUePU4xG 7SBdUpWcixRiKMzf02d0Ld4w2RKW/KbmQoitNlNPMG8wyx+qEekyWNY044ta/06qAKtK39O 8V3Xo4evXsPGnP6L4VlK8hwDbis68Hg== Received: from slamain ([172.56.178.196]) by vsel1nmtao01p.internal.vadesecure.com with ngmta id f4d15844-18145550369c05eb; Wed, 25 Dec 2024 05:45:59 +0000 Message-ID: <676b9af6.7.mr2ice.fgrirsq@earthlink.net> Date: Tue, 24 Dec 2024 21:41:10 -0800 To: "eCS ISP Mailing List" In-Reply-To: Subject: Re: [eCS-ISP] Injoy rule (portmap internet IP -> lan) X-Mailer: MR/2 Internet Cruiser Edition for OS/2 v3.00.11.24/60 In , on 12/24/24 at 09:32 AM, "Massimo S." said: Hi Massimo, >this don't produce any log As I said before pretty much what I expected. >i'm starting to believe that Injoy do anything on the NIC2 >since it's binded on the NIC1/WAN Why would you ever think it could? Take a look at your protocol.ini. Ijfw can only see packets that pass through fxwrap. What I've never tried is to bind fxwrap to both interfaces on an 2 NIC setup. Baring defects it should work. I would expect that you would need run two instances of gateway.exe with two sets of rules. Steven -- ---------------------------------------------------------------------- "Steven Levine" Warp/DIY/BlueLion etc. www.scoug.com www.arcanoae.com www.warpcave.com ----------------------------------------------------------------------