From: "Steven Levine" Received: from [192.168.100.201] (HELO mail.2rosenthals.com) by 2rosenthals.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 5.4.10) with ESMTP id 12677121 for ecs-isp@2rosenthals.com; Tue, 01 Apr 2025 22:35:38 -0400 Received: from [192.168.200.201] (port=55278 helo=mail2.2rosenthals.com) by mail.2rosenthals.com with esmtp (Exim 4.97.1) (envelope-from ) id 1tznwI-000000000pR-1Yvs for ecs-isp@2rosenthals.com; Tue, 01 Apr 2025 22:34:50 -0400 Received: from mta-202a.earthlink-vadesecure.net ([51.81.232.240]:60487) by mail2.2rosenthals.com with esmtps (TLS1.2) tls TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (Exim 4.97.1) (envelope-from ) id 1tznwA-000000004QG-17VR for ecs-isp@2rosenthals.com; Tue, 01 Apr 2025 22:34:42 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; bh=ElZ8XhKpGZAKqQxoxvY19oE9Cy4Uq/x4nnvHpB YbFxo=; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=earthlink.net; h=from:reply-to:subject: date:to:cc:resent-date:resent-from:resent-to:resent-cc:in-reply-to: references:list-id:list-help:list-unsubscribe:list-unsubscribe-post: list-subscribe:list-post:list-owner:list-archive; q=dns/txt; s=dk12062016; t=1743561281; x=1744166081; b=hD+piGQv5ZseK38RpAS1ed218Lg 5wtxDEMarLSnw9ys/aTigkJFiiHRS/7dWnM5xHoalzB2g3bbUBaOIg5RtAGd0XSg8SyGbH4 vE37SimkkLOAnTgDMiTsaFA45uo1cIkJXCIkME0Uw3kd5eOCt5bDfL9Wm2bmnxI5qnPO/+d UKIIcFKPFqEDkecjkRGvQ1P2F3mAEUzG4ChQNiI3zkW7ukIZlR59bJJfojyxn24Orn67hZG q1t4M2Qa82N2x2aFFUJ6yRpBcMdKS/j4NenLRTe9kTqNnIOmx6EzO0Bs13JLXepzvTylH3a KQkJd7eFZPb7CouLQGj6cpiEj5/n9Ig== Received: from slamain ([172.56.177.206]) by vsel2nmtao02p.internal.vadesecure.com with ngmta id 8555623e-18325fbf543b0930; Wed, 02 Apr 2025 02:34:41 +0000 Message-ID: <67ec9a5d.17.mr2ice.fgrirsq@earthlink.net> Date: Tue, 01 Apr 2025 19:01:01 -0700 To: "eCS ISP Mailing List" In-Reply-To: Subject: Re: [eCS-ISP] Updating bind X-Mailer: MR/2 Internet Cruiser Edition for OS/2 v3.00.11.24/60 In , on 04/01/25 at 09:14 PM, "Massimo S." said: Hi massimo, >any help? I can't help you until you help yourself and provide a proper exceptq report. Unfortunately for you currently I don't have time to explain yet again, in gory detail, what a proper exceptq report means. It's been discussed many many times on this list and elsewhere. DOS hint -when I receive a zipped exceptq report via private mail what was generated by Exceptq Version: 7.10 (Mar 1 2011) it's going to going at the end of the queue. I am curious why you thought using a 14 year old version of exceptq was a wise decision. I am also curious why you thought it was a wise decision to send me an exceptq report that contains lines like? EBP Address Module Obj:Offset Nearest Public Symbol -------- --------- -------- ------------- ----------------------- Trap -> 1F2BDD06 LIBCN0 0001:000FDD06 0367F084 1F2BE4D6 LIBCN0 0001:000FE4D6 Your setup is clearly missing requried xqs and/or sym files. Common sense tells us that 0367F354 0018E5ED NAMED 0001:0017E5ED lex.c#869 _isc_lex_gettoken 0001:0017E235 (lex.obj) implies that bind is having some sort of problem parsing a token in some data stream or file Common sense also tells us 0367FDD4 001F0583 NAMED 0001:001E0583 zone.c#2623 _dns_zone_cdscheck 0001:001DA98F (zone.obj) the problem is probably in one of the zone files. Common sense tells us that we should scan the exceptq report, bad as it is, just in case the name of the problematic zone file was reported. I might be able to make some more common sense guesses with a proper exceptq report. Steven -- ---------------------------------------------------------------------- "Steven Levine" Warp/DIY/BlueLion etc. www.scoug.com www.arcanoae.com www.warpcave.com ----------------------------------------------------------------------