From: "Steven Levine" Received: from [192.168.100.201] (HELO mail.2rosenthals.com) by 2rosenthals.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 5.4.10) with ESMTP id 12683348 for ecs-isp@2rosenthals.com; Fri, 04 Apr 2025 18:23:19 -0400 Received: from secmgr-va.2rosenthals.com ([50.73.8.217]:38314 helo=mail2.2rosenthals.com) by mail.2rosenthals.com with esmtps (TLS1.2) tls TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (Exim 4.97.1) (envelope-from ) id 1u0pRR-000000007FG-1HrR for ecs-isp@2rosenthals.com; Fri, 04 Apr 2025 18:23:13 -0400 Received: from mta-202b.earthlink-vadesecure.net ([51.81.232.241]:49299 helo=mta-202a.earthlink-vadesecure.net) by mail2.2rosenthals.com with esmtps (TLS1.2) tls TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (Exim 4.97.1) (envelope-from ) id 1u0pRO-000000001b2-1Ce4 for ecs-isp@2rosenthals.com; Fri, 04 Apr 2025 18:23:10 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; bh=s9iEeSGLnkVblqJkPF0FXPQE/Rehj1Fpmys0/W DKbI8=; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=earthlink.net; h=from:reply-to:subject: date:to:cc:resent-date:resent-from:resent-to:resent-cc:in-reply-to: references:list-id:list-help:list-unsubscribe:list-unsubscribe-post: list-subscribe:list-post:list-owner:list-archive; q=dns/txt; s=dk12062016; t=1743805388; x=1744410188; b=pMgjOwH62i9MtOOgVtB7LELAe4n 65wEAD4uBR96iUMLZX51Mq0WqRDiZITF6GDTzauvPz5byp9+jKjfVLXf/9gIPm69XPwWhDf /O3lfEPwYS0AM+on2A7Kn7B0FifBa8sgdTCznnkmx7Drqpz0KR6k6puCpDlmuBU0eyD7dk8 s7QFgTC070kR+q1IqfJQNBVRq0DiiZYLpi6PvpLTf9o6YqdZuJVcRWBNVybsF+qQ/uq9suj fgQIbYGmgUtw0rMm2k/5RKyldPdnmpdqJmoMlOCNtk4jhz0FugHrRgWME/1EiV3987QtWah YtSI4lcvwN7X4aL4gT9C7VyzMGukIbQ== Received: from slamain ([172.56.177.206]) by vsel2nmtao02p.internal.vadesecure.com with ngmta id 3a8e76ff-18333dc3091453f5; Fri, 04 Apr 2025 22:23:08 +0000 Message-ID: <67f05b76.27.mr2ice.fgrirsq@earthlink.net> Date: Fri, 04 Apr 2025 15:21:42 -0700 To: "eCS ISP Mailing List" In-Reply-To: Subject: Re: [eCS-ISP] Updating bind X-Mailer: MR/2 Internet Cruiser Edition for OS/2 v3.00.11.24/60 In , on 04/03/25 at 08:44 PM, "Massimo S." said: Hi Massimo, >In same cases it give out RC = 1 even if the DNS is answering and working >correctly, so now i've updated my rexx to use the BIND 9.11.37 nslookup >for the checks. I guess this surely will improve the situation and result >in less reboots. >I will let you know. Can I take it that this issue is unrelated to the bind exceptions we have been discussing? Steven -- ---------------------------------------------------------------------- "Steven Levine" Warp/DIY/BlueLion etc. www.scoug.com www.arcanoae.com www.warpcave.com ----------------------------------------------------------------------