From: "Steven Levine" Received: from [192.168.100.201] (HELO mail.2rosenthals.com) by 2rosenthals.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 5.4.10) with ESMTP id 14830267 for ecs-isp@2rosenthals.com; Sat, 08 Nov 2025 18:45:39 -0500 Received: from [192.168.200.201] (port=53327 helo=mail2.2rosenthals.com) by mail.2rosenthals.com with esmtp (Exim 4.98.2) (envelope-from ) id 1vHscc-0000000012a-1Bqz for ecs-isp@2rosenthals.com; Sat, 08 Nov 2025 18:45:30 -0500 Received: from mta-102b.earthlink-vadesecure.net ([51.81.61.67]:38655 helo=mta-102a.earthlink-vadesecure.net) by mail2.2rosenthals.com with esmtps (TLS1.2) tls TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (Exim 4.98.2) (envelope-from ) id 1vHscZ-000000003m8-21yP for ecs-isp@2rosenthals.com; Sat, 08 Nov 2025 18:45:28 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; bh=mdZZUznUM3ZcyBcDz3WSkq4+XTv9zWhsT8Tgvy l7AWI=; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=earthlink.net; h=from:reply-to:subject: date:to:cc:resent-date:resent-from:resent-to:resent-cc:in-reply-to: references:list-id:list-help:list-unsubscribe:list-unsubscribe-post: list-subscribe:list-post:list-owner:list-archive; q=dns/txt; s=dk12062016; t=1762645527; x=1763250327; b=b//uRLjoGO1z9EX5ZcfGDhv0rdz MUxzK1fioi59zwBUrObGhYeJvQMmjwDaEij6EhQn2ejgUm2KWp9W3tWo0l29KurH2DieSkk AqXu49OaFj3HaEkDz6fOAtFe9wpd2ejmeVxaUziP4py4jsPTIQlzmh7dXvNUtv3Fb8rdxEH MHeVsl5/V0Riv3vUqAvDhZDDcF32gkeOfyEgUAfwmF/WZbxm2WrhfTRWlOx10vHpCrO+rU5 C1727tsKplgWCXrTk9iDOUcAGsGtGX3Un++YgoIpTi/U2+rCx2UADYOUjWsB2ZaFhfB+7PQ zaLdrCP4Xf/W8IS58J34yKCtx27iStw== Received: from slamain ([107.202.224.188]) by vsel1nmtao02p.internal.vadesecure.com with ngmta id ab02ed1f-18762cc494dafe2c; Sat, 08 Nov 2025 23:45:27 +0000 Message-ID: <690fd483.27.mr2ice.fgrirsq@earthlink.net> Date: Sat, 08 Nov 2025 15:38:43 -0800 To: "eCS ISP Mailing List" In-Reply-To: Subject: Re: [eCS-ISP] ClamAV 0.103.10 out-of-date X-Mailer: MR/2 Internet Cruiser Edition for OS/2 v3.00.11.24/60 In , on 11/09/25 at 06:32 AM, "Paul Smedley" said: Hi all, >Que Sera.... As I mentioned years ago - 0.103.x is the last version that >doesn't use rust code. It is what it is.... While it is theoretically possible to build a modified version of 0.103.10 that could download the 1.0.9 database files, there's no way to know if your 0.103.10 could load and use them. In addition, the log messages you posted do not match what's in the code. Without a full, unedited set of log files for the failed download attempts, there's no way to guess if it's even worth the effort to think about implementing a modified version. Steven -- ---------------------------------------------------------------------- "Steven Levine" Warp/DIY/BlueLion etc. www.scoug.com www.arcanoae.com www.warpcave.com ----------------------------------------------------------------------