From: "Steven Levine" Received: from [192.168.100.201] (HELO mail.2rosenthals.com) by 2rosenthals.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 5.4.10) with ESMTPS id 5663233 for ecs-isp@2rosenthals.com; Wed, 23 Nov 2022 17:41:52 -0500 Received: from secmgr-va.2rosenthals.com ([50.73.8.217]:58788 helo=mail2.2rosenthals.com) by mail.2rosenthals.com with esmtps (TLS1.2) tls TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (Exim 4.95) (envelope-from ) id 1oxyRC-00039Z-0f for ecs-isp@2rosenthals.com; Wed, 23 Nov 2022 17:41:50 -0500 Received: from mta-202b.earthlink-vadesecure.net ([51.81.232.241]:45719 helo=mta-202a.earthlink-vadesecure.net) by mail2.2rosenthals.com with esmtps (TLS1.2) tls TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (Exim 4.95) (envelope-from ) id 1oxyR9-0004xx-1C for ecs-isp@2rosenthals.com; Wed, 23 Nov 2022 17:41:47 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; bh=y27zO70XbzcMIxcuT2cwlILHKADNiltO9OrLSi Rjuto=; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=earthlink.net; h=from:reply-to:subject: date:to:cc:resent-date:resent-from:resent-to:resent-cc:in-reply-to: references:list-id:list-help:list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-post: list-owner:list-archive; q=dns/txt; s=dk12062016; t=1669243306; x=1669848106; b=btUH9Q9ABulX9XD35z1RczOzeKNMu0iswll6L78z5LtoVRLUutTHlaw wq3PfZtKW5TDG9FZNb3uLem7miEqnn0v07O3THqZmIMjylyZ8ApX2YhqQgppukPIluAkSNl fKTuHtpv3q5oZnQTDp83HpiCBa6t3BcNkosA8UCsdIcvbELIaKVnRQhnN+pYXzLc2zSxwRu 88JCKqioukflrnE0u/JRuW1F7f1KIjILJhF7AqI0vm8dpobnvQyGa0NugbYvMkUo8nVu8as dR7WBbROuLMPKHsf14ePTnWX5AyXQ9s484WBq7lGzX1o3WlCR8Gjs2gh9EGzHePksKgZI0x NiA== Received: from slamain ([108.193.252.8]) by smtp.earthlink-vadesecure.net ESMTP vsel2nmtao02p with ngmta id 09509d97-172a57f161814423; Wed, 23 Nov 2022 22:41:46 +0000 Message-ID: <637e9d38.14.mr2ice.fgrirsq@earthlink.net> Date: Wed, 23 Nov 2022 14:22:48 -0800 To: "eCS ISP Mailing List" In-Reply-To: Subject: Re: [eCS-ISP] help about an Injoy FW rule X-Mailer: MR/2 Internet Cruiser Edition for OS/2 v3.00.11.24/60 In , on 11/23/22 at 10:42 PM, "Massimo S." said: Hi Massimo, >i need to add a 2nd IP You said that, but that does not answer my question. My question was "what's not working with your new rule?" While I did not say it, I assumed you where showing the one rule you currently had in place. >e.g. 1.2.3.4 and 2.3.4.5 >those IP are not contiguos e.g. 1.2.3.4 and 1.2.3.5 I would write two rules. myportmap_in1 and myportmap_in2. >i've seen those 3 .cnf, but they are completely useless >all the sources are just one IP this is a (much) basic configuration They are only useless if you assume that your config can only have one Portmap rule. The examples in no way imply this. Steven -- ---------------------------------------------------------------------- "Steven Levine" Warp/DIY/BlueLion etc. www.scoug.com www.arcanoae.com www.warpcave.com ----------------------------------------------------------------------