From: "Massimo S." Received: from [192.168.100.201] (HELO mail.2rosenthals.com) by 2rosenthals.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 5.4.10) with ESMTPS id 298516 for ecs-isp@2rosenthals.com; Sun, 26 Jan 2020 08:06:19 -0500 Received: from [192.168.200.201] (port=40904 helo=mail2.2rosenthals.com) by mail.2rosenthals.com with esmtp (Exim 4.82_1-5b7a7c0-XX) (envelope-from ) id 1ivhd9-0003RO-0F for ecs-isp@2rosenthals.com; Sun, 26 Jan 2020 08:07:11 -0500 Received: from mail2.quasarbbs.net ([80.86.52.115]:10016) by mail2.2rosenthals.com with esmtp (Exim 4.82_1-5b7a7c0-XX) (envelope-from ) id 1ivhYG-0006H8-33 for ecs-isp@2rosenthals.com; Sun, 26 Jan 2020 08:02:09 -0500 Received: from [192.168.10.199] (dtp [192.168.10.199]) by srv2 (Weasel v2.71) for ; 26 Jan 2020 14:02:05 X-CTCH-RefID: str=0001.0A02020B.5E2D8DD1.0021,ss=1,re=0.000,recu=0.000,reip=0.000,cl=1,cld=1,fgs=0 Reply-To: ml@ecomstation.it Subject: Re: [eCS-ISP] bind - which version? To: eCS ISP Mailing List References: Organization: eComStation dot it Message-ID: <1fadba41-3dff-9fd6-4dc8-799541afb5c5@ecomstation.it> Date: Sun, 26 Jan 2020 14:02:04 +0100 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (OS/2; U; Warp 4.5; it-IT; rv:1.7.13) Gecko/20060424 Thunderbird/1.0.8 Mnenhy/0.7.4.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Language: it-IT Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Il 26/01/2020 00:59, Paul Smedley ha scritto: > HI guys, > > On 24/1/20 7:42 pm, Massimo S. wrote: >> >> >> Il 24/01/2020 02:41, Steven Levine ha scritto: >>> In , on 01/24/20 >>>     at 12:54 AM, "Ian Manners" said: >>> >>>> I would upgrade your version of bind to 9.11.10. >>>> I'm using bind-9.11.10-os2-20190822.zip, works well. >>> >>> FWIW, Paul built: >>> >>>   bind-9.11.12-os2-20191023.zip >>> >>> 9.11 is an ESV release that will be supported by ISC until Q1 2022. >>> >>> We are bit behind in that the current ESV is 9.11.15. >>> >>> Steven >>> >> >> Hi Steven, >> >> i already tried that build, but it gave me issues >> expecially the one of cpu overload (100%) and other problems with weasel >> (but maybe they are child of the 1st issue) > > The good news, I can now reproduce the 100% cpu usage with 9.11.12.  The bad news, 9.11.15 has > the same issue :( > > Cheers, > > Paul Hi Paul, also Stunnel: http://smedley.id.au/downloads/stunnel-5.50-os2.zip build often uses a lot of cpu it seems without a good reason (e.g. just one connection or nothing) massimo