From: "Steven Levine" Received: from [192.168.100.201] (HELO mail.2rosenthals.com) by 2rosenthals.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 5.4.10) with ESMTPS id 7061402 for ecs-isp@2rosenthals.com; Thu, 27 Apr 2023 19:45:00 -0400 Received: from [192.168.200.201] (port=52161 helo=mail2.2rosenthals.com) by mail.2rosenthals.com with esmtp (Exim 4.96) (envelope-from ) id 1psBIA-0005re-1q for ecs-isp@2rosenthals.com; Thu, 27 Apr 2023 19:44:50 -0400 Received: from mta-102b.earthlink-vadesecure.net ([51.81.61.67]:45459 helo=mta-102a.earthlink-vadesecure.net) by mail2.2rosenthals.com with esmtps (TLS1.2) tls TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (Exim 4.96) (envelope-from ) id 1psBI5-0001wy-32 for ecs-isp@2rosenthals.com; Thu, 27 Apr 2023 19:44:45 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; bh=y4grRlkd1A7Ismt3AmNLPOfpxg0fZqmKOp4rF2 mW6tc=; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=earthlink.net; h=from:reply-to:subject: date:to:cc:resent-date:resent-from:resent-to:resent-cc:in-reply-to: references:list-id:list-help:list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-post: list-owner:list-archive; q=dns/txt; s=dk12062016; t=1682639084; x=1683243884; b=X2w2UiW5LA65xYzsTqYPCvh018rhmD0sKfc77CDDAvtP/EsHLBIxJSX KLjPnWC3nhA5ayOABlQVtlSDV3QEUnhFHwTFvfUlazDHb6j35nE7fLQfepZYtDNHFXlbPvO KEaTDFp24UIsaZUfdke9RVcEGBT3um2fiQTmxiZ45pbv6Ma4cj8kMc7h/p1fxwdJykqDqGv i1rkD6FGy2cobIiPmiayLlPiiZxtf+FYVDRyCW9qIV+nl6/j7t3gjOnY2dAG888J9FEpZWe 0DXHZOuXBNBZfXoaaEP+YotQ5FHgkYBx2zeTfXdvVIPqZUDYWfN/ZQ197vqOFh958LAdWiv IqA== Received: from slamain ([108.193.254.151]) by smtp.earthlink-vadesecure.net ESMTP vsel1nmtao02p with ngmta id ba1af140-1759ef54f2e19711; Thu, 27 Apr 2023 23:44:44 +0000 Message-ID: <644afc0f.4.mr2ice.fgrirsq@earthlink.net> Date: Thu, 27 Apr 2023 15:49:51 -0700 To: "eCS ISP Mailing List" In-Reply-To: Subject: Re: [eCS-ISP] InJoy FW 4.2.2 issue with a rule "failed to send packet" X-Mailer: MR/2 Internet Cruiser Edition for OS/2 v3.00.11.24/60 In , on 04/27/23 at 11:04 PM, "Massimo S." said: Hi, >no, if i add the new rule IF give the issue of: Fatal: failed to send >packet... >if i just comment one of the 3 includes, the issue is fixed >(of course after reboot of the server) OK, so what you mean is the new rule works fine if you delete one or more of the existing rules. What happens if rather than commenting one of the includes, you comment out one rule from one of the includes? Steven -- ---------------------------------------------------------------------- "Steven Levine" Warp/DIY/BlueLion etc. www.scoug.com www.arcanoae.com www.warpcave.com ----------------------------------------------------------------------