From: "Massimo S." Received: from [192.168.100.201] (HELO mail.2rosenthals.com) by 2rosenthals.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 5.4.10) with ESMTPS id 7151544 for ecs-isp@2rosenthals.com; Sat, 13 May 2023 16:23:54 -0400 Received: from secmgr-va.2rosenthals.com ([50.73.8.217]:42069 helo=mail2.2rosenthals.com) by mail.2rosenthals.com with esmtps (TLS1.2) tls TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (Exim 4.96) (envelope-from ) id 1pxvmG-0001RU-37 for ecs-isp@2rosenthals.com; Sat, 13 May 2023 16:23:41 -0400 Received: from mail2.quasarbbs.net ([80.86.52.115]:10108) by mail2.2rosenthals.com with esmtp (Exim 4.96) (envelope-from ) id 1pxvm8-0005pJ-39 for ecs-isp@2rosenthals.com; Sat, 13 May 2023 16:23:33 -0400 X-SASI-Hits: BODYTEXTP_SIZE_3000_LESS 0.000000, BODY_SIZE_1000_LESS 0.000000, BODY_SIZE_2000_LESS 0.000000, BODY_SIZE_5000_LESS 0.000000, BODY_SIZE_7000_LESS 0.000000, BODY_SIZE_800_899 0.000000, CTE_8BIT 0.000000, HTML_00_01 0.050000, HTML_00_10 0.050000, IN_REP_TO 0.000000, LEGITIMATE_SIGNS 0.000000, MSGID_SAMEAS_FROM_HEX_844412 0.100000, MSG_THREAD 0.000000, NO_CTA_URI_FOUND 0.000000, NO_URI_HTTPS 0.000000, RCVD_EXIM_IP_PORT 1.000000, REFERENCES 0.000000, REPLYTO_SAMEAS_FROM 0.000000, SENDER_NO_AUTH 0.000000, SUSP_DH_NEG 0.000000, TO_IN_SUBJECT 0.500000, __ANY_URI 0.000000, __BODY_NO_MAILTO 0.000000, __BOUNCE_CHALLENGE_SUBJ 0.000000, __BOUNCE_NDR_SUBJ_EXEMPT 0.000000, __CT 0.000000, __CTE 0.000000, __CT_TEXT_PLAIN 0.000000, __DQ_NEG_DOMAIN 0.000000, __DQ_NEG_HEUR 0.000000, __DQ_NEG_IP 0.000000, __FORWARDED_MSG 0.000000, __FROM_DOMAIN_NOT_IN_BODY 0.000000, __FROM_NAME_NOT_IN_ADDR 0.000000, __FROM_NAME_NOT_IN_BODY 0.000000, __FUR_HEADER 0.000000, __HAS_FROM 0.000000, __HAS_MSGID 0.000000, __HAS_REFERENCES 0.000000, __HAS_REPLYTO 0.000000, __HEADER_ORDER_FROM 0.000000, __IN_REP_TO 0.000000, __MAIL_CHAIN 0.000000, __MIME_BOUND_CHARSET 0.000000, __MIME_TEXT_ONLY 0.000000, __MIME_TEXT_P 0.000000, __MIME_TEXT_P1 0.000000, __MIME_VERSION 0.000000, __MOZILLA_USER_AGENT 0.000000, __MSGID_HEX_844412 0.000000, __NO_HTML_TAG_RAW 0.000000, __PHISH_SPEAR_SUBJECT 0.000000, __PHISH_SPEAR_SUBJ_ALERT 0.000000, __PHISH_SPEAR_SUBJ_PREDICATE 0.000000, __RCVD_EXIM_IP_PORT 0.000000, __REFERENCES 0.000000, __REPLYTO_SAMEAS_FROM_ACC 0.000000, __REPLYTO_SAMEAS_FROM_ADDY 0.000000, __REPLYTO_SAMEAS_FROM_DOMAIN 0.000000, __SANE_MSGID 0.000000, __SCAN_D_NEG 0.000000, __SCAN_D_NEG2 0.000000, __SCAN_D_NEG_HEUR 0.000000, __SCAN_D_NEG_HEUR2 0.000000, __SUBJ_ALPHA_NEGATE 0.000000, __SUBJ_REPLY 0.000000, __TO_IN_SUBJECT 0.000000, __TO_MALFORMED_2 0.000000, __TO_NAME 0.000000, __TO_NAME_DIFF_FROM_ACC 0.000000, __TO_REAL_NAMES 0.000000, __URI_MAILTO 0.000000, __URI_NO_WWW 0.000000, __URI_NS 0.000000, __USER_AGENT 0.000000 X-SASI-Probability: 16% X-SASI-RCODE: 200 X-SASI-Version: Antispam-Engine: 5.1.1, AntispamData: 2023.5.13.200317 X-SASI-Hits: BODYTEXTP_SIZE_3000_LESS 0.000000, BODY_SIZE_1000_LESS 0.000000, BODY_SIZE_2000_LESS 0.000000, BODY_SIZE_5000_LESS 0.000000, BODY_SIZE_7000_LESS 0.000000, BODY_SIZE_800_899 0.000000, CTE_8BIT 0.000000, HTML_00_01 0.050000, HTML_00_10 0.050000, IN_REP_TO 0.000000, LEGITIMATE_SIGNS 0.000000, MSGID_SAMEAS_FROM_HEX_844412 0.100000, MSG_THREAD 0.000000, NO_CTA_URI_FOUND 0.000000, NO_URI_HTTPS 0.000000, REFERENCES 0.000000, REPLYTO_SAMEAS_FROM 0.000000, SUSP_DH_NEG 0.000000, TO_IN_SUBJECT 0.500000, __ANY_URI 0.000000, __AUTH_RES_PASS 0.000000, __BODY_NO_MAILTO 0.000000, __BOUNCE_CHALLENGE_SUBJ 0.000000, __BOUNCE_NDR_SUBJ_EXEMPT 0.000000, __CT 0.000000, __CTE 0.000000, __CT_TEXT_PLAIN 0.000000, __DQ_NEG_DOMAIN 0.000000, __DQ_NEG_HEUR 0.000000, __DQ_NEG_IP 0.000000, __FORWARDED_MSG 0.000000, __FROM_DOMAIN_NOT_IN_BODY 0.000000, __FROM_NAME_NOT_IN_ADDR 0.000000, __FROM_NAME_NOT_IN_BODY 0.000000, __FUR_HEADER 0.000000, __HAS_FROM 0.000000, __HAS_MSGID 0.000000, __HAS_REFERENCES 0.000000, __HAS_REPLYTO 0.000000, __HEADER_ORDER_FROM 0.000000, __IN_REP_TO 0.000000, __MAIL_CHAIN 0.000000, __MIME_BOUND_CHARSET 0.000000, __MIME_TEXT_ONLY 0.000000, __MIME_TEXT_P 0.000000, __MIME_TEXT_P1 0.000000, __MIME_VERSION 0.000000, __MOZILLA_USER_AGENT 0.000000, __MSGID_HEX_844412 0.000000, __NO_HTML_TAG_RAW 0.000000, __PHISH_SPEAR_SUBJECT 0.000000, __PHISH_SPEAR_SUBJ_ALERT 0.000000, __PHISH_SPEAR_SUBJ_PREDICATE 0.000000, __REFERENCES 0.000000, __REPLYTO_SAMEAS_FROM_ACC 0.000000, __REPLYTO_SAMEAS_FROM_ADDY 0.000000, __REPLYTO_SAMEAS_FROM_DOMAIN 0.000000, __SANE_MSGID 0.000000, __SCAN_D_NEG 0.000000, __SCAN_D_NEG2 0.000000, __SCAN_D_NEG_HEUR 0.000000, __SCAN_D_NEG_HEUR2 0.000000, __SUBJ_ALPHA_NEGATE 0.000000, __SUBJ_REPLY 0.000000, __TO_IN_SUBJECT 0.000000, __TO_MALFORMED_2 0.000000, __TO_NAME 0.000000, __TO_NAME_DIFF_FROM_ACC 0.000000, __TO_REAL_NAMES 0.000000, __URI_MAILTO 0.000000, __URI_NO_WWW 0.000000, __URI_NS 0.000000, __USER_AGENT 0.000000 X-SASI-Probability: 10% X-SASI-RCODE: 200 X-SASI-Version: Antispam-Engine: 5.1.1, AntispamData: 2023.5.13.193917 Received: from [192.168.10.199] (dtp [192.168.10.199]) by srv2 (Weasel v2.79) for ; 13 May 2023 22:17:39 Reply-To: ml@ecomstation.it Subject: Re: [eCS-ISP] InJoy FW 4.2.2 issue with a rule "failed to send packet" To: eCS ISP Mailing List References: Organization: eComStation dot it Message-ID: Date: Sat, 13 May 2023 22:17:30 +0200 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (OS/2; U; Warp 4.5; it-IT; rv:1.7.13) Gecko/20060424 Thunderbird/1.0.8 Mnenhy/0.7.4.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-15; format=flowed Content-Language: it-IT Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Il 08/05/2023 12:36, Massimo S. ha scritto: > > > Il 30/04/2023 21:35, Steven Levine ha scritto: >> In , on 04/30/23 >>     at 07:56 PM, "Massimo S." said: >> >> Hi Massimo, >> >> >>> about the fact that if i restart the firewall it goes into this "syn sent >>> for all packets/comatose state" and i've to setboot /b is also known by >>> Bitwiseworks. >> >> What does "known by bww" mean?  Does it mean that they can replicate the >> failure or does it mean that you have reported the issue to them? >> >> Steven > > they say they can't explain this error. It's not from Injoy direct. We suspect it's from either the NIC driver > or the TCP/IP stack. > > i'm going to do other tests in the next days > > massimo BWW asked to use a lower port for the rule, i tried, but it show the same issue massimo