From: "Steven Levine" Received: from [192.168.100.201] (HELO mail.2rosenthals.com) by 2rosenthals.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 5.4.10) with ESMTPS id 7891915 for ecs-isp@2rosenthals.com; Wed, 13 Sep 2023 21:27:01 -0400 Received: from [192.168.200.201] (port=54249 helo=mail2.2rosenthals.com) by mail.2rosenthals.com with esmtp (Exim 4.96) (envelope-from ) id 1qgb86-0006Y9-2g for ecs-isp@2rosenthals.com; Wed, 13 Sep 2023 21:26:50 -0400 Received: from mta-102a.earthlink-vadesecure.net ([51.81.61.66]:60727) by mail2.2rosenthals.com with esmtps (TLS1.2) tls TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (Exim 4.96) (envelope-from ) id 1qgb7u-0007Jm-2V for ecs-isp@2rosenthals.com; Wed, 13 Sep 2023 21:26:38 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; bh=IWcqcTklvPcAGY8aWsPv3t6UYDvghKK/ilODpl Qn/wA=; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=earthlink.net; h=from:reply-to:subject: date:to:cc:resent-date:resent-from:resent-to:resent-cc:in-reply-to: references:list-id:list-help:list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-post: list-owner:list-archive; q=dns/txt; s=dk12062016; t=1694654798; x=1695259598; b=galK+K+uLEdN9AFd13ilxCyzVkH14wYcEeIwJzg3HgjEZPDMbWJ03gx UZjVggncWpepJbqb+qT1mdCO0xHbT6lrh4F2JEZkzcGWXHOOyZ5geJPmoZ2pRT2yzPWeNxi +oPMDl6qZZ8HKKg9rdmXTn9Pw+egGB4+cbF5ilunN1QVQY1+BF9DE7PVYU4qXkBZ5lkBR9o 8gbBVh7LflRHVw9sGtLpyLs2kENfXKMX2e6cgvJFw3b3Si1axe67vEG0VQNeCUVtzg77lmn KbSdi9K8ju41O1Gr/Xq5j5xblEWLcTqFifsDV2BjS2ZRWvrLzjcP9qeNXd5BNdGi6HivJAC n8w== Received: from slamain ([108.193.253.100]) by vsel1nmtao02p.internal.vadesecure.com with ngmta id eb1938b5-17849f8f603eefd8; Thu, 14 Sep 2023 01:26:38 +0000 Message-ID: <65026011.16.mr2ice.fgrirsq@earthlink.net> Date: Wed, 13 Sep 2023 18:21:21 -0700 To: "eCS ISP Mailing List" In-Reply-To: Subject: Re: [eCS-ISP] stunnel 5.58 help X-Mailer: MR/2 Internet Cruiser Edition for OS/2 v3.00.11.24/60 In , on 09/13/23 at 08:46 PM, "Massimo S." said: Hi, >i don't want to buy a certificate SSL There's always Let's Encrypt. The only downside is the expire relatively quickly so you need to refresh the script more often than a purchased script. >should i use IJ fw to port fwd the 587 to something like 33333 :) do i >will allways reach 587 port from the inside LAN here? I'm not sure I understand how you envision your setup or the full scope of your problem. The user's are going to submit via 587. Are you saying you want to port forward to 33333 internaally have have Weasel list to 33333. That can work, but what's the downside of passing port 587 through to the server running the weasel instance? Steven -- ---------------------------------------------------------------------- "Steven Levine" Warp/DIY/BlueLion etc. www.scoug.com www.arcanoae.com www.warpcave.com ----------------------------------------------------------------------