From: "Steven Levine" Received: from [192.168.100.201] (HELO mail.2rosenthals.com) by 2rosenthals.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 5.4.10) with ESMTPS id 9641727 for ecs-isp@2rosenthals.com; Sat, 11 May 2024 19:26:14 -0400 Received: from secmgr-va.2rosenthals.com ([50.73.8.217]:55825 helo=mail2.2rosenthals.com) by mail.2rosenthals.com with esmtps (TLS1.2) tls TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (Exim 4.96) (envelope-from ) id 1s5w6U-0008Ay-26 for ecs-isp@2rosenthals.com; Sat, 11 May 2024 19:26:10 -0400 Received: from mta-102a.earthlink-vadesecure.net ([51.81.61.66]:57665) by mail2.2rosenthals.com with esmtps (TLS1.2) tls TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (Exim 4.96) (envelope-from ) id 1s5w6N-0002yX-1V for ecs-isp@2rosenthals.com; Sat, 11 May 2024 19:26:03 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; bh=+Tt99GC+lsCQC8HI1pHOmmjXFWZw13XmcgOqgV IeZYk=; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=earthlink.net; h=from:reply-to:subject: date:to:cc:resent-date:resent-from:resent-to:resent-cc:in-reply-to: references:list-id:list-help:list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-post: list-owner:list-archive; q=dns/txt; s=dk12062016; t=1715469963; x=1716074763; b=FS2AbVHjRcXljFzkphpgsUCkgTHQ4XcPdbWmbM61qe1ogWYdVk2DcqX NAQLfr3UMJ/la3cm2rT8tW6oQ7fjhVb4wWhE8z1pHHOhRi9vp+aIwh3uuueXhwiWmnO8n6O F4C/ZTq3VjEbdyDcLeG3tE1qBqJOn3puzKva7kYIu9oz+Ar/ASVSRE9EBmx5/v7LK+NVTL8 PreaX/9PJZNYzABREX5cfvLHre7jZoBtzLWRwpiW7y/Ytq921NYO+umOJWa40J1xej/a7m7 RCNM56ZMlfgKy3EjxQJwC2kZ+H3nhQldp53SCf/Utrzcod8lNRWJfLiW1i9WtiLtXhXc/uV 2sA== Received: from slamain ([108.193.255.37]) by vsel1nmtao02p.internal.vadesecure.com with ngmta id c050dd88-17ce92d793d570ea; Sat, 11 May 2024 23:26:02 +0000 Message-ID: <663ffaa9.2.mr2ice.fgrirsq@earthlink.net> Date: Sat, 11 May 2024 16:09:29 -0700 To: "eCS ISP Mailing List" In-Reply-To: Subject: Re: [eCS-ISP] Bind 9.11.37 issue X-Mailer: MR/2 Internet Cruiser Edition for OS/2 v3.00.11.24/60 In , on 05/11/24 at 11:02 AM, "Massimo S." said: Hi Massimo, I have reviewed ticket #784. Please add a testlog. Make sure to use the most recent version of testlog. A copy of the output of go.exe for the system when it is running normally might be helpful too. >so i moved everything on this new VM >eCS2.2b 6cores 4GB ram What platform are you running VirtualBox under? WIndows? Linux? What version of VirtualBox? >anyway it seems slower in performances than the old setup on bare metal >but running MPCPUMON.EXE the VM sees correctly 6 cores Why did you choose to run with 6 cores? Did you test with fewer or more cores and find that 6 provides the best overall performance? Have you tried running with one core, just in case this is causing your bind problem? It's unlikely, but you should test this. everything it's keep up to date with YUM/ANPM wget, klibc, curl, etc. etc. Please use anpm and run Tools -> Export package list and attach the listing file to the ticket. Once I have had a chance to review the new data, I will verify that "r f d o" is what we want to use to capture the dump file. It probably is since named does not have any private DLLs. Steven -- ---------------------------------------------------------------------- "Steven Levine" Warp/DIY/BlueLion etc. www.scoug.com www.arcanoae.com www.warpcave.com ----------------------------------------------------------------------