From: "Steven Levine" Received: from [192.168.100.201] (HELO mail.2rosenthals.com) by 2rosenthals.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 5.4.10) with ESMTP id 10148314 for ecs-isp@2rosenthals.com; Wed, 03 Jul 2024 19:00:20 -0400 Received: from secmgr-va.randr ([192.168.200.201]:54472 helo=mail2.2rosenthals.com) by mail.2rosenthals.com with esmtp (Exim 4.97.1) (envelope-from ) id 1sP8xO-000000006rX-1F4v for ecs-isp@2rosenthals.com; Wed, 03 Jul 2024 19:00:10 -0400 Received: from mta-102b.earthlink-vadesecure.net ([51.81.61.67]:41605 helo=mta-102a.earthlink-vadesecure.net) by mail2.2rosenthals.com with esmtps (TLS1.2) tls TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (Exim 4.97.1) (envelope-from ) id 1sP8xC-000000001C8-1Vr7 for ecs-isp@2rosenthals.com; Wed, 03 Jul 2024 18:59:58 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; bh=AePDUGXCq9RJsLZWK9SUJs01Atm3cp4bNNs4Xw B9yWw=; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=earthlink.net; h=from:reply-to:subject: date:to:cc:resent-date:resent-from:resent-to:resent-cc:in-reply-to: references:list-id:list-help:list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-post: list-owner:list-archive; q=dns/txt; s=dk12062016; t=1720047598; x=1720652398; b=OaFbUhnUwKgQSY8iy9j0X/rQSt2pGomswMM1bMPoZdwi+27Fl5jWi/r ea0w6YGPI8iKcbr85kOOKIvrzM41s7rMJ1n13o05Yn5yB3ha3K0qeCb7d9FysFHgkN/Cac6 62yQAy7GkWfx5FtEdGXiPudrm4ZL84XBEWM8DAHCy6YxFwUjO017HVxAC/3ROgZIBApGRDg hkczppvmAYrJ0CPe8e9yzKsbKSC8OrDfZ0/juyPzUpI5JjFVJAWnYljCaVElViCpfKGUnzW s8tvwtN8VlwpUafIqpFqhAt47z81TNCsaPYid/ZqgNhZCtJcaUz4pMoV9caBSq95kBrpKtX ofQ== Received: from slamain ([172.56.189.10]) by vsel1nmtao02p.internal.vadesecure.com with ngmta id 8ded99e3-17ded62d525a1efa; Wed, 03 Jul 2024 22:59:58 +0000 Message-ID: <6685d686.3.mr2ice.fgrirsq@earthlink.net> Date: Wed, 03 Jul 2024 15:53:58 -0700 To: "eCS ISP Mailing List" In-Reply-To: Subject: Re: [eCS-ISP] Bind 9.11.37 issue - ticket #784 - update X-Mailer: MR/2 Internet Cruiser Edition for OS/2 v3.00.11.24/60 In , on 07/03/24 at 07:17 PM, "Paul Smedley" said: Hi Paul, >I chose 5 seconds... I confirmed this yesterday in the debugger. Turns out I can replicate both Massimo's hang and Massimo's 100% CPU utilization here, but my reference sources are a bit too far out of sync for easy use under the debugger. This implies to me that the issues we are seeing are in some other thread. When you get a chance, please provide a diff or populate a bind-os2 repo in your github. Thanks, Steven P.S. A diff of your current libcn and libcx patches would be welcome. I'm planning to implement some debugging code that hopefully will make tracking down the qt6 out of memory issues easier. -- ---------------------------------------------------------------------- "Steven Levine" Warp/DIY/BlueLion etc. www.scoug.com www.arcanoae.com www.warpcave.com ----------------------------------------------------------------------