From: "Roderick Klein" <ecs-isp@2rosenthals.com>
Message-ID: <66C3B4BD.8010504@xs4all.nl>
Date: Mon, 19 Aug 2024 23:10:21 +0200
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (OS/2; Warp 4.5; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.6.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: eCS ISP Mailing List <ecs-isp@2rosenthals.com>
Subject: Re: [eCS-ISP] inetcfg.ini tuning
References: <list-10511056@2rosenthals.com> <list-10610408@2rosenthals.com> <list-10610673@2rosenthals.com> <list-10640222@2rosenthals.com>
In-Reply-To: <list-10640222@2rosenthals.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-15; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

On 19-08-24 13:22, Massimo S. wrote:
>
>
> Il 16/08/2024 22:23, Lewis G Rosenthal ha scritto:
>> PMFJI
>>
>> On 08/16/24 12:09 pm, Massimo S. wrote:

> Hi Lewis,
>
> i'm sorry, but i've this issue on the firewalls to my customers'places
> and also here in my office.
>
> At my customer's places i've improved the download data rate, but anyway
> i still have some issue, eg. sometimes download go to zero and they
> stuck, etc. etc.

How much this the bandwith improve with ?

I know thw FXWRAP driver was improved. But I am not certain how much 
overhead tis gives.

The downloads get stuck on the PC's behind the firewall I assume ?
Do these downloads that get stuck, does that also happen on the PC it self.

> I guess that for the future, we need to port another stack IP and to
> anbandon the
> old one from IBM.

That is a LOT of work. I do not know if that is going to really happen.

> Here on my server where i upgraded Injoy FW from 4.2.2 to 4.2.3 i still
> have the issue
> and i fear to change too many parameters since it's a production server
> (mail+dns+etc.)
>
> I could activate mtudiscovery if it help.

Turn that on!



Roderick