From: "Steven Levine" Received: from [192.168.100.201] (HELO mail.2rosenthals.com) by 2rosenthals.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 5.4.10) with ESMTP id 11063085 for ecs-isp@2rosenthals.com; Sat, 05 Oct 2024 00:09:50 -0400 Received: from [192.168.200.201] (port=53944 helo=mail2.2rosenthals.com) by mail.2rosenthals.com with esmtp (Exim 4.97.1) (envelope-from ) id 1sww6u-000000004HB-19ZN for ecs-isp@2rosenthals.com; Sat, 05 Oct 2024 00:09:40 -0400 Received: from mta-202a.earthlink-vadesecure.net ([51.81.232.240]:58155) by mail2.2rosenthals.com with esmtps (TLS1.2) tls TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (Exim 4.97.1) (envelope-from ) id 1sww6m-00000000436-1NP9 for ecs-isp@2rosenthals.com; Sat, 05 Oct 2024 00:09:32 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; bh=YcD4ouCS33OopNWESjLN/9u1poBGl1XkPRe6pY 6dmM4=; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=earthlink.net; h=from:reply-to:subject: date:to:cc:resent-date:resent-from:resent-to:resent-cc:in-reply-to: references:list-id:list-help:list-unsubscribe:list-unsubscribe-post: list-subscribe:list-post:list-owner:list-archive; q=dns/txt; s=dk12062016; t=1728101371; x=1728706171; b=rIy0IefG6dEWXoygJyhWUWW1QeR RFRcghyY4YNUD08mgiyGx4MA5K3QKuk3Wt65SJNcFmVoqI8egqHDrOfyaAFLCJEs/xCdyFg nypb/afF2wKP9swCjNJMzQCkvE+RTBQg1QRyg1eBIDle0mdFxExXZyb3hkCWWAaxel2uq56 lCn6YfFd60wpnpBHKpADUVx4pxiGdoCs0QF9XH4eXogPtAAF5wNEDBmVxSezLxTo+Gj+Zlo 4xCXFelNvtyiSFa/0pMAmTggAMl9UOOAWAcENoaZkuRdB4trLhi3shoyw5TUE1YnFD/wljl in+g6gtHPqe+yBwggyCgJtLjLSNe/nw== Received: from slamain ([172.58.119.108]) by vsel2nmtao02p.internal.vadesecure.com with ngmta id 5ff85b5c-17fb730a9834ba89; Sat, 05 Oct 2024 04:09:31 +0000 Message-ID: <6700b65a.11.mr2ice.fgrirsq@earthlink.net> Date: Fri, 04 Oct 2024 20:45:30 -0700 To: "eCS ISP Mailing List" In-Reply-To: Subject: Re: [eCS-ISP] SSL certs & apache 2.4.61 X-Mailer: MR/2 Internet Cruiser Edition for OS/2 v3.00.11.24/60 In , on 10/04/24 at 10:47 PM, "Lewis G Rosenthal" said: Hi, >Surely, that should work as well as my approach to move the conf to an >alternate directory, though ISTR some issue with checking variables in >conf files where the variable does not exist (faded memory from >something we were testing a couple decades ago, so perhaps I'm >misremembering). Are you thinking our PassEnv issue, which we ran into much more recently than decades ago. This thread, for some reason, triggered me to revist the PassEnv issue where there appears to be no way to avoid a warning if the environment variable is not defined. I got to refresh my knowledge of how If directive expressions worked along with some not 100% obvious implementation issues related to httpd.conf parsing. The warnings are still there. Unfortunately, the PassEnv implementation checks if the variable exists when the PassEnv directive is parsed, not when it is invoked. This means it's not possible to wrap the PassEnv in conditional code to avoid the warning or if there is, I have not found it yet. >As I said, that is the correct way to do this. :-) Steven -- ---------------------------------------------------------------------- "Steven Levine" Warp/DIY/BlueLion etc. www.scoug.com www.arcanoae.com www.warpcave.com ----------------------------------------------------------------------