From: "Jon Harrison" Received: from [192.168.100.201] (HELO mail.2rosenthals.com) by 2rosenthals.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 5.1.16) with ESMTP id 2033132 for ecs-t6x@2rosenthals.com; Tue, 26 Aug 2008 17:24:25 -0400 Received: from static-71-171-102-26.clppva.fios.verizon.net ([71.171.102.26] helo=mail2.2rosenthals.com) by secmgr-ny.randr with esmtps (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.43) id 1KY61T-00077e-GU for ecs-t6x@2rosenthals.com; Tue, 26 Aug 2008 17:24:24 -0400 Received: from pop5-wpti.greatbasin.net ([216.162.174.5]:50180 helo=pop5.greatbasin.net) by mail2.2rosenthals.com with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1KY61c-0004Kj-2V for ecs-t6x@2rosenthals.com CTCH-RefID str=0001.0A01020A.48B47480.0122,ss=1,fgs=0; Tue, 26 Aug 2008 17:24:29 -0400 Received: from DP6550.seadog.reno.nv.us (seadog.reno.nv.us [216.82.144.188]) (authenticated bits=0) by pop5.greatbasin.net (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id m7QLOCQO029123 for ; Tue, 26 Aug 2008 14:24:13 -0700 Received: from TYAN (TYAN [192.168.1.35]) by DP6550.seadog.reno.nv.us (Weasel v 1.72) for ; 26 Aug 2008 14:24:11 -0700 Message-ID: <100-7874b448-13926.002@seadog.reno.nv.us> To: "eCS ThinkPad T60/61 Mailing List" Date: Tue, 26 Aug 2008 14:24:08 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <196002.14.50.12.24.08.2008@seadog.reno.nv.us> References: <196002.14.50.12.24.08.2008@seadog.reno.nv.us> Priority: Normal User-Agent: PMMail/3.01 (os/2; U; Warp 4.5; en-US; i386; ver 3.01.09.1111) X-Mailer: PMMail 3.01.09.1111 for OS/2 Warp 4.5 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain;charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Migrate fails X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Spam-Report: _SUMMARY_ On Sun, 24 Aug 2008 15:45:59 -0600, Chuck McKinnis wrote: > The RC5 install in migrate mode blows >at the beginning of Phase 2. Joachim sent me an updated migrate.cmd >file that at least let me complete Phase 2, but I still had a mess at >the end and wound up doing a fresh install of RC5 with a manual >migration from my RC4 backup. Chuck: I tried migrate of rc4 to rc5 on my TP61. It gives me an error at the end of phase 1, cmd.exe returns rc=299. Start of phase 2 gives same error and so now I have a munged system that I'll probably do a fresh install of rc5 to get it going again. Is rc=299 the same problem you got? I'm not going to bother to report this unless it is different from what you got. Jon