From: "Chuck McKinnis" Received: from [192.168.100.201] (HELO mail.2rosenthals.com) by 2rosenthals.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 5.1.16) with ESMTP id 2844966 for ecs-t6x@2rosenthals.com; Tue, 01 Sep 2009 19:45:35 -0400 Received: from secmgr-va.2rosenthals.com ([162.83.95.194] helo=mail2.2rosenthals.com) by secmgr-ny.randr with esmtps (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.43) id 1Mid2c-0003jJ-GN for ecs-t6x@2rosenthals.com; Tue, 01 Sep 2009 19:45:34 -0400 Received: from rc.7cities.net ([12.155.8.5]:47083) by mail2.2rosenthals.com with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Mid2Z-0002wq-2t for ecs-t6x@2rosenthals.com; Tue, 01 Sep 2009 19:45:32 -0400 Received: from typhoon.7cities.net ([12.155.8.2]) by smtp1143.redcondor.net ({ee245a7a-c395-435f-a231-bc0ed40126a2}) via TCP (outbound) with ESMTP id 20090901234528691 for ; Tue, 01 Sep 2009 16:45:28 -0700 X-CTCH-RefID: str=0001.0A020202.4A9DB21C.00AA:SCFSTAT3669893,ss=1,fgs=0 X-RC-FROM: X-RC-RCPT: Received: from [192.168.2.107] (w-albuq-9-102.7cities.net [12.155.9.102]) (authenticated bits=0) by typhoon.7cities.net (8.12.11.20060308/8.12.11) with ESMTP id n81NjOXN002918 for ; Tue, 1 Sep 2009 17:45:24 -0600 Message-ID: <4A9DB213.9010108@sandia.net> Date: Tue, 01 Sep 2009 17:45:23 -0600 User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.23 (OS/2/20090822) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: eCS ThinkPad T60/61 Mailing List Subject: Re: [eCS T60/T61] OT: APM and kernel tyes (was: Re: [eCS T60/T61] Installing rc7 on T61) References: In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Lewis G Rosenthal wrote: > Hi, Chuck... > > On 08/31/09 11:38 pm, Chuck McKinnis thus wrote : >> Jon wrote: >>> On Mon, 31 Aug 2009 19:53:33 -0600 Chuck McKinnis wrote: >>>> >>>> >>>> If you plan to use SMP, do not install APM. >>>> >>> >>> >>> Chuck: >>> >>> So IIRC, under advanced install, APM is selected by default and ACPI >>> is not. Am I correct in understanding you are recommending >>> unselecting APM at this point in the pre-install screen? >>> >>> Thanks, Jon >> >> Absolutely. The SMP kernel, which was developed for Warp Server, >> never expected to be suspended or throttled. Pasha is working on a >> patch, but I don't think it is complete yet. >> > Any idea whether the UNI kernel includes APM support, Chuck, and whether > the UNI kernel might be lacking something which ACPI would want in order > to enable SMP? I have been running the UNI kernel on my T43 for a long > time, APM works, and it suspends (no ACPI!!). I'm just curious as to > whether that m8ght fast track the APM support under SMP for the T60/61, > T400/500, related systems, and some desktops. > > TIA > I am not sure if the UNI kernel had the same APM support as the W4 kernel. It is about 3K less in size. The SMP kernel is aobut 50K bigger than either of the others. I am pretty sure most of that is code for supporting multiple processors. Is the APM support on your T43 the IBM or eCS APM code? The IBM APM code did not know what ACPI was. However, one of the options for OS2APIC.PSD was /APIC. -- Chuck McKinnis 1449 State Highway 14 N Sandia Park, NM 87047 505-286-3191 http://www.7cities.net/~mckinnis/ Be not overcome of evil, but overcome evil with good. Romans 12:21