From: "Jon Harrison" Received: from [192.168.100.201] (HELO mail.2rosenthals.com) by 2rosenthals.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 5.1.16) with ESMTP id 2877060 for ecs-t6x@2rosenthals.com; Mon, 14 Sep 2009 13:06:13 -0400 Received: from secmgr-va.2rosenthals.com ([162.83.95.194] helo=mail2.2rosenthals.com) by secmgr-ny.randr with esmtps (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.43) id 1MnF0F-00021B-0L for ecs-t6x@2rosenthals.com; Mon, 14 Sep 2009 13:06:13 -0400 Received: from pop1.greatbasin.net ([207.228.42.15]:43850) by mail2.2rosenthals.com with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1MnF0C-0006Pa-1F for ecs-t6x@2rosenthals.com; Mon, 14 Sep 2009 13:06:08 -0400 Received: from DP6550.seadog.reno.nv.us (seadog.reno.nv.us [216.82.144.188]) (authenticated bits=0) by pop1.greatbasin.net (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id n8EH661N019958 for ; Mon, 14 Sep 2009 10:06:06 -0700 Received: from 8bells ([192.168.1.101] [192.168.1.101]) by DP6550.seadog.reno.nv.us (Weasel v1.78) for ; 14 Sep 2009 10:06:07 -0700 X-CTCH-RefID: str=0001.0A010203.4AAE7800.00C3,ss=1,fgs=0 Message-ID: <100.b0360000f277ae4a.010@seadog.reno.nv.us> To: "eCS ThinkPad T60/61 Mailing List" Date: Mon, 14 Sep 2009 10:05:54 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: Priority: Normal User-Agent: PMMail/3.05 (os/2; U; Warp 4.5; en-US; i386; ver 3.05.42.1415) X-Mailer: PMMail 3.05.42.1415 for OS/2 Warp 4.5 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: [eCS T60/T61] Installing rc7 on T61 X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Spam-Report: _SUMMARY_ On Mon, 14 Sep 2009 08:39:59 -0400 Lewis G Rosenthal wrote: > > >That's true. In my setups, I either query the DNS as I described, or >just throw in the towel and use the management tools available (there is >a Java-based configuration utility for Novell DNS and DHCP, and there is >the web-based iManager; either of which will list assigned hosts). Are you doing this w/ os/2? Last I knew many of the nifty little apps didn't work w/ OS/2. It's been several years since I gave up on Netware and no longer run it here so I've lost touch. >> Explains why I never had much luck when I played with dig. ;-) >> >> >:-) Certainly not for your local network. However, dig is the preferred >way of querying outside sources (nslookup is considered deprecated, >although M$ continues to use it). The required syntax always gave me trouble, I didn't use it enough to get it down pat. Maybe I better look at it again sometime. Thanks, jon