From: "Leszek Kubrak" Received: from [192.168.100.201] (HELO mail.2rosenthals.com) by 2rosenthals.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 5.1.16) with ESMTP id 1886515 for ecs-t6x@2rosenthals.com; Wed, 04 Nov 2009 10:25:05 -0500 Received: from secmgr-va.2rosenthals.com ([162.83.95.194] helo=mail2.2rosenthals.com) by secmgr-ny.randr with esmtps (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.43) id 1N5hjI-0001Zi-Nk for ecs-t6x@2rosenthals.com; Wed, 04 Nov 2009 10:25:05 -0500 Received: from infokub.com.pl ([83.142.191.201]:43677) by mail2.2rosenthals.com with esmtps (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1N5hj9-0005uQ-1H for ecs-t6x@2rosenthals.com; Wed, 04 Nov 2009 10:24:52 -0500 Received: from [10.1.1.210] (cyf54.internetdsl.tpnet.pl [83.19.165.54]) (authenticated bits=0) by infokub.com.pl (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id nA4FOiWb031025 for ; Wed, 4 Nov 2009 16:24:46 +0100 X-CTCH-RefID: str=0001.0A020203.4AF19CC4.0009,ss=1,fgs=0 Message-ID: <4AF19CBC.8070106@infokub.com.pl> Date: Wed, 04 Nov 2009 16:24:44 +0100 User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.23 (OS/2/20090822) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: eCS ThinkPad T60/61 Mailing List Subject: Re: [eCS T60/T61] Question about T60 models References: In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-2; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Spam-Report: _SUMMARY_ Neil Waldhauer wrote: > On Wed, 04 Nov 2009 08:00:07 -0500, "Martin Iturbide" > wrote: > >> I used to have a T61 with eComStation 2.0 RC5 installed on it. I don't >> longer have the machine. >> >> I posted my comments on this wiki page. >> http://www.os2world.com/wiki/index.php/EComStation_and_OS2_on_Lenovo_Thinkpad_T61 > > Thanks Martin, and thanks to everyone who posted to the list since its > inception. Thanks to Lewis for pointing me to the archives. Before I select the > model to buy, I'm wondering if sound is as bad as all that. Martin's page says > he could only get one channel to work. > > I never saw a resolution about the wired network card, either. It would be a > lot better if a non-zero MAC address can be assigned. I have frequently > assigned one in protocol.ini for some desktop machines, and I saw a recent hack > to GenMac to assign a MAC address. Is this now resolved? > > I'm still leaning in favor of T60, but I can see that T61 is kind of attractive > from Martin's post, as long as sound and wired network can function. > > best regards, > Neil I'm playing with T-61p type 6458-CTO and have all hardware working (except fire wire off course). -- ========================= Leszek KUBRAK