From: "Jon Harrison" Received: from [192.168.100.201] (HELO mail.2rosenthals.com) by 2rosenthals.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 5.1.3) with ESMTP id 1871458 for ecs-t6x@2rosenthals.com; Tue, 22 Apr 2008 17:16:44 -0400 Received-SPF: none (secmgr-ny.randr: 216.162.174.5 is neither permitted nor denied by domain of seadog.reno.nv.us) client-ip=216.162.174.5; envelope-from=jharrison@seadog.reno.nv.us; helo=pop5.greatbasin.net; Received: from pop5-wpti.greatbasin.net ([216.162.174.5] helo=pop5.greatbasin.net) by secmgr-ny.randr with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1JoPqz-0003t3-2I for ecs-t6x@2rosenthals.com; Tue, 22 Apr 2008 17:16:44 -0400 Received: from DP6550.seadog.reno.nv.us (seadog.reno.nv.us [216.82.144.188]) (authenticated bits=0) by pop5.greatbasin.net (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id m3MLGblk024372 for ; Tue, 22 Apr 2008 14:16:38 -0700 Received: from TYAN.seadog.reno.nv.us (TYAN.seadog.reno.nv.us [192.168.1.35]) by DP6550.seadog.reno.nv.us (Weasel v1.72) for ; 22 Apr 2008 14:16:37 -0700 Message-ID: <100-b2550e48-25181.028@seadog.reno.nv.us> To: "eCS ThinkPad T60/61 Mailing List" Date: Tue, 22 Apr 2008 14:16:34 -0700 (PDT) Priority: Normal User-Agent: PMMail/3.00 (os/2; U; Warp 4.5; en-US; i386; ver 3.00.00.0935) X-Mailer: PMMail 3.00.00.0935 for OS/2 Warp 4.5 In-Reply-To: <185649.12.00.11.22.04.2008@seadog.reno.nv.us> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: [eCS T60/T61] Wireless vs. Cable settings X-Spam-Score: -1.4 (-) X-Spam-Report: -1.4 ALL_TRUSTED Passed through trusted hosts only via SMTP On Tue, 22 Apr 2008 14:59:49 -0400, Lewis G Rosenthal wrote: >Jon, could you give us some more addressing information, such as: > > * IP subnet of your wired (and wireless) network(s) 192.168.1, I use a mask of 255.255.255.0 > * Topology of your network, i.e., wired connection goes through > switch A to router A; wireless goes from AP A to switch B to > router B to router A, etc. dsl -> os/2 firewall/gateway -> hub -> computers | -> linksys wrt54g set up as hub > * What IP addresses are you using for wired vs wireless? If these > are on the same subnet, the addresses should be different, so as > not to confuse arp tables built by other equipment. The TP is assigned 192.168.1.229 - wired cat5; .230 is wireless >Yes, I am seeing this, too, but haven't been able to nail down the >cause. I did not see it with ACPI 3.07. I'm using acpi 3.08. I think I will grab 3.07 and see if that gets me to the wps. >What the "Add router name to DNS" option should really read is "Add AP >name to HOSTS." This will not help you with DNS lookups at all. The fact >that rseolv2 is getting overwritten is either a bug (I haven't tested it >myself) or something else at play. Well, all I have to do is activate that option and it overwrites resolv2. When I initially set this up it took me quite some time to figure out what was happening. It is probably the correct thing to do if you are using dhcp & ddns. >On the TCP/IP page of your profile, when you click the More TCP/IP >Options... button, what do you have entered? If using a static IP and if >you have nothing entered for DNS, this will delete the entry in resolv2 >(or rather, when the wired is turned off, the entry is removed, and this >would not re-populate it - unless the correct entry is filled in). Typing from memory, it is the gateway ip address. Since I can't boot at the moment I can't check that. However, I can say that when I turned it on this morning, w/o the wire, when I finally got it booted (after 3 crashes) I decided to try the option box for dns once again since all evidence pointed to not getting dns. Before doing this I saved the resolv2, so know that this morning I had a fully populated resolv2. After saving it, I checked again and it had only 1 entry, the entry I made in the option box. >Christian really should add more fields to allow for secondary and >tertiary name servers to be added when using a static IP. I'll ask him >about this. That would be great, and it would clear up some confusion from folks like me. Another point, I notice that XP allows more than 3 entires. Checking just now (booted to maintenance console) the saved version I have has 5 entires in it. I don't think this would be a problem, if anything, it should ignore entries over 3 if it matters. >What I see from eCenter is a propensity for it to exit unexpectedly. On >my T43, I have the full Xworkplace package installed and do not see >that. I'm not sure whether it's ACPI related, widget-related, or >something else. Thanks for the reply, Jon