Gönderim Listesi ecs-t6x@2rosenthals.com Ar?vli ?leti #99

Gönderen: "Jon Harrison" <ecs-t6x@2rosenthals.com> Tam Ba?l?klar
Çözülmemi? ?leti
Konu: Re: [eCS T60/T61] Wireless vs. Cable settings
Tarih: Tue, 22 Apr 2008 16:42:35 -0700 (PDT)
Alacak: "eCS ThinkPad T60/61 Mailing List" <ecs-t6x@2rosenthals.com>

On Tue, 22 Apr 2008 18:22:09 -0400, Lewis G Rosenthal wrote:

>So the WRT54G is the only switch on your network, and you have an OS/2
>box serving as a bastion server connected to the DSL. This is
>interesting, because with a WRT54G, I would normally put that on the
>outside, and use it as a NAT firewall/router instead of a real computer.

I understand.  However, I set up the firewall computer w/ IJFW
quite a few years prior to obtaining the linksys.  I considered
that I could change it but why bother?  I might get a better
troughput with the linksys than w/ the PIII Compaq (w/ 2 nic's)
that servers as my NAT firewall/router.

>So, I assume that the OS/2 box on the outside has two NICs in it and is
>routing traffic to the net for you. Are you running DNS on this, or is
>the 1.1.1.1 address something else?

No, I'm not running dns, ddns on the linksys.  I vaguely recall
that perhaps 1.1.1.1 means to pass through the dns requests to the
next stop upstream.  I'm not really sure of this, only that it
works.

>Interesting. The next time you encounter the trouble, try pinging some
>IP addresses on the net. A good one to test is one of GTE's old DNS boxes:

Been there, done that.  Ping'd yahoo's IP and got no response.
Also tried nslookup on my isp, & google.  That is when I decided I
had either a gateway or dns problem.  And when the gateway was
correctly set I figured it was dns.  What is really odd is that the
ping only works on the inside.  And when I was (and still am)
unable to boot I moved over to xp and it works fine, proving that
there is not a hardware issue.

>I used to routinely keep four or five in my resolv2. excess entries are
>simply ignored. The important lines are the top two (domain and first DNS).

That is what I figured, I just tossed it out for comment in case it
was a no-no.

I just pulled down the v3.07 stuff.  I don't know why I couldn't
see those files this morning.  Also I was unaware that apm had to
be matched w/ acpi so I need to check and see what version I have
for apm.  

Thanks,
Jon


Abone ol: Bildirim, Derleme, Fihrist.
Abonelikten ç?k
Liste Sorumlusuna Postala