From: "Steven Levine" Received: from [192.168.100.201] (HELO mail.2rosenthals.com) by 2rosenthals.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 5.4.10) with ESMTPS id 3012176 for gnuports@2rosenthals.com; Tue, 01 Feb 2022 01:30:41 -0500 Received: from secmgr-va.2rosenthals.com ([50.73.8.217]:39097 helo=mail2.2rosenthals.com) by mail.2rosenthals.com with esmtps (TLS1.2) tls TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (Exim 4.94.2) (envelope-from ) id 1nEmgR-0008Rr-0R for gnuports@2rosenthals.com; Tue, 01 Feb 2022 01:30:31 -0500 Received: from mta-201a.oxsus-vadesecure.net ([51.81.229.180]:55773 helo=nmtao201.oxsus-vadesecure.net) by mail2.2rosenthals.com with esmtps (TLS1.2) tls TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (Exim 4.94.2) (envelope-from ) id 1nEmgN-0003id-21 for gnuports@2rosenthals.com; Tue, 01 Feb 2022 01:30:27 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; bh=jsJmodvj7TcxoRve4tqcef33WP45wS3sSkFXd1 Q9wJ0=; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=earthlink.net; h=from:reply-to:subject: date:to:cc:resent-date:resent-from:resent-to:resent-cc:in-reply-to: references:list-id:list-help:list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-post: list-owner:list-archive; q=dns/txt; s=dk12062016; t=1643697026; x=1644301826; b=YkbTuKJ/ZtdK7z26SXA0mc4QbbLI9ksR3JYqnVyHLw5/g49gPpA/fcE imabLNCWHiBD185xN2DHA2uuBvbHhuXwuxmkqNM3KOpEoIVMzjF7HwOBmnCExKfGFgVu/EU f9C0yj7LQH2jBslUvw0VEnrFMu3xA5lKPwuhpAKb5eOntNabZQnQKIEObq3ncXLndF7/M6q hTEhViPq7xrvZr5WEy3Zb2IiMF9NmsCSDgTUKPoxBiHWxGw8pCIunLyIyzknTT3XqN9l00c iLUlt0meE4L6Abx2tF5eAn5SEaRA9bDJfX4hJ1cSDSSqSwD1LDTfJLewSLWmKidx0Lz3Esw R5Q== Received: from slamain ([108.193.253.194]) by smtp.oxsus-vadesecure.net ESMTP oxsus2nmtao01p with ngmta id 332e824c-16cf95bc980d6362; Tue, 01 Feb 2022 06:30:26 +0000 Date: Mon, 31 Jan 2022 22:20:00 -0800 To: "GNU Ports for eCS Mailing List" In-Reply-To: Subject: Re: [GNU Ports] Building privoxy - need to specify PTHREAD_LIB - why? X-Mailer: MR/2 Internet Cruiser Edition for OS/2 v3.00.11.21 BETA/60 Message-ID: In , on 02/01/22 at 12:27 AM, "Lewis G Rosenthal" said: Hi Lewis, How snowed in are you? >I'm using gcc 9.2.0. I wonder if I should try building with a different >gcc, and if the behavior is different (different=does not require a full >path to the library), perhaps a bug report is in order? I doubt that's going to do anything helpful in this case. To see the buitin specs, use: gcc -dumpspecs Search for pthreads and compare what the option provides to what the link says is provided on other platforms. We support -pthread, but not -pthreads. It is somewhat interesting that considering the age of this link, our gcc's have never supported the -pthreads option. Steven -- ---------------------------------------------------------------------- "Steven Levine" Warp/DIY/BlueLion etc. www.scoug.com www.arcanoae.com www.warpcave.com ----------------------------------------------------------------------