From: "Doug Bissett" <lswitcher-dev@2rosenthals.com>
Message-ID: <002.485f03007649755f.005@telus.net>
To: "lSwitcher Developers Mailing List" <lswitcher-dev@2rosenthals.com>
Date: Wed, 30 Sep 2020 21:13:58 -0600 (MDT)
Reply-To: "Doug Bissett" <dougb007@telus.net>
In-Reply-To: <list-1170479@2rosenthals.com>
References: <list-1140418@2rosenthals.com>
  <list-1150094@2rosenthals.com>
  <list-1150194@2rosenthals.com>
  <list-1150401@2rosenthals.com>
  <list-1150786@2rosenthals.com>
  <list-1170345@2rosenthals.com>
  <list-1170455@2rosenthals.com>
  <list-1170479@2rosenthals.com>
Priority: Normal
User-Agent: PMMail/3.25 (os/2; U; Warp 4.5; en-CA; i386; ver 3.25.00.1990)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Subject: Re: [lswitcher-dev] lSwitcher-2-92-0-RC_12.wpi

On 2020-09-30, at 20:26:51, Gregg Young wrote:
> 
> >>Having seen r13b, I think I concur with Lewis: I'd prefer a single
> >>'Close' lSwitcher menu entry for folders in the taskbar (since only
> >>that makes sense), but for programs, and if possible, I'd rather have a
> >>'Close' submenu with the different methods. I think Dos/Sigkill look a
> >>bit daunting, not being normal words and that, and it would be better
> >>if at least non-tech-savvy people can tell right away they're just
> >>modes of closing a task.
> >>
> >
> >Exactly.
> 
> I will look at fixing this. Last change for 2.92. Thanks

Personally, I would prefer to not see Dos/Sigkill in something like 
lSwitcher. If a normal close (or "quit", if somebody thinks that is 
actually necessary) won't do the job, they probably should be using 
CADH or TOP to do it. In fact, I don't see a need to have "close" or 
"quit" either. Click the entry, to surface the program, then close, or 
quit, as desired (or is that too complicated?).

Sometimes, more features are just too much, and they often cause 
unexpected problems.

Just my C$.03...

-- 
****************************
From Doug Bissett's ArcaOS system
dougb007 at telus.net
****************************
... There are people running governments who shouldn't be allowed to play with matches.