From: "Gregg Young" Received: from [192.168.100.201] (HELO mail.2rosenthals.com) by 2rosenthals.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 5.4.10) with ESMTPS id 1171521 for lswitcher-dev@2rosenthals.com; Thu, 01 Oct 2020 15:41:58 -0400 Received: from [192.168.200.201] (port=54855 helo=mail2.2rosenthals.com) by mail.2rosenthals.com with esmtp (Exim 4.82_1-5b7a7c0-XX) (envelope-from ) id 1kO4Sh-0001pL-0q for lswitcher-dev@2rosenthals.com; Thu, 01 Oct 2020 15:41:55 -0400 Received: from mail.onyx.syn-alias.com ([206.152.134.66]:44075 helo=smtp.centurylink.net) by mail2.2rosenthals.com with esmtps (TLSv1.2:DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384:256) (Exim 4.82_1-5b7a7c0-XX) (envelope-from ) id 1kO4No-00031F-0F for lswitcher-dev@2rosenthals.com; Thu, 01 Oct 2020 15:36:52 -0400 X-CTCH-RefID: str=0001.0A020206.5F763103.0020,ss=1,re=0.000,recu=0.000,reip=0.000,cl=1,cld=1,fgs=0 X-CTCH-RefID: str=0001.0A020210.5F762FD4.000E,ss=1,re=0.000,recu=0.000,reip=0.000,cl=1,cld=1,fgs=0 Return-Path: X_CMAE_Category: , , X-CNFS-Analysis: v=2.3 cv=OvIxNB3t c=1 sm=1 tr=0 a=AhLag5gAyMpl8Ac6OuiE9g==:117 a=AhLag5gAyMpl8Ac6OuiE9g==:17 a=KGjhK52YXX0A:10 a=IkcTkHD0fZMA:10 a=afefHYAZSVUA:10 a=ysqN1OIC4P0A:10 a=eQrCS-SpgXYA:10 a=y_hCEIy6AAAA:8 a=WGaJB7ofwksQi2Q5mbAA:9 a=QEXdDO2ut3YA:10 a=oF_bVFE_NRt-FRUPIfFZ:22 X-CM-Score: 0 X-Scanned-by: Cloudmark Authority Engine Feedback-ID: dfw:ctl:res:onyx X-Authed-Username: eWdrQHF3ZXN0Lm5ldA== Authentication-Results: smtp04.onyx.dfw.sync.lan smtp.user=ygk@qwest.net; auth=pass (LOGIN) Received: from [71.37.78.186] ([71.37.78.186:65193] helo=ZOBOPEEP) by smtp.centurylink.net (envelope-from ) (ecelerity 3.6.25.56547 r(Core:3.6.25.0)) with ESMTPA id E7/23-29611-2DF267F5; Thu, 01 Oct 2020 15:36:50 -0400 Message-ID: <100.88010300c72f765f.013@qwest.net> To: "lSwitcher Developers Mailing List" Date: Thu, 01 Oct 2020 13:36:39 -0600 (MDT) Reply-To: "Gregg Young" In-Reply-To: References: Priority: Normal User-Agent: PMMail/3.25 (os/2; U; Warp 4.5; en-US; i386; ver 3.25.00.1984) X-Mailer: PMMail 3.25.00.1984 for OS/2 Warp 4.5 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: [lswitcher-dev] lSwitcher-2-92-0-RC_12.wpi On Thu, 1 Oct 2020 11:35:22 -0500 Andy Willis wrote: > >On Wed, Sep 30, 2020, 22:19 Doug Bissett >wrote: > >> On 2020-09-30, at 20:26:51, Gregg Young wrote: >> > >> > >>Having seen r13b, I think I concur with Lewis: I'd prefer a single >> > >>'Close' lSwitcher menu entry for folders in the taskbar (since >> > >>only >> > >>that makes sense), but for programs, and if possible, I'd rather >> > >>have a >> > >>'Close' submenu with the different methods. I think Dos/Sigkill >> > >>look a >> > >>bit daunting, not being normal words and that, and it would be >> > >>better >> > >>if at least non-tech-savvy people can tell right away they're just >> > >>modes of closing a task. >> > >> >> > > >> > >Exactly. >> > >> > I will look at fixing this. Last change for 2.92. Thanks >> >> Personally, I would prefer to not see Dos/Sigkill in something like >> lSwitcher. If a normal close (or "quit", if somebody thinks that is >> actually necessary) won't do the job, they probably should be using >> CADH or TOP to do it. In fact, I don't see a need to have "close" or >> "quit" either. Click the entry, to surface the program, then close, or >> quit, as desired (or is that too complicated?). >> >> Sometimes, more features are just too much, and they often cause >> unexpected problems. >> >> Just my C$.03... >> > >I use sig-kill from lswitcher quite often. I do also. I am leaning toward moving the kill options back to a submenu without QUIT. Please let me know if you prefer them like they are in RC_13. Thanks Gregg