Mailing List lswitcher-dev@2rosenthals.com Archived Message #108

From: "Gregg Young" <lswitcher-dev@2rosenthals.com> Full Headers
Undecoded message
Subject: Re: [lswitcher-dev] lSwitcher-2-92-0-RC_12.wpi
Date: Thu, 01 Oct 2020 13:36:39 -0600 (MDT)
To: "lSwitcher Developers Mailing List" <lswitcher-dev@2rosenthals.com>

On Thu, 1 Oct 2020 11:35:22 -0500 Andy Willis wrote:
>
>On Wed, Sep 30, 2020, 22:19 Doug Bissett <lswitcher-dev@2rosenthals.com>
>wrote:
>
>> On 2020-09-30, at 20:26:51, Gregg Young wrote:
>> >
>> > >>Having seen r13b, I think I concur with Lewis: I'd prefer a single
>> > >>'Close' lSwitcher menu entry for folders in the taskbar (since
>> > >>only
>> > >>that makes sense), but for programs, and if possible, I'd rather
>> > >>have a
>> > >>'Close' submenu with the different methods. I think Dos/Sigkill
>> > >>look a
>> > >>bit daunting, not being normal words and that, and it would be
>> > >>better
>> > >>if at least non-tech-savvy people can tell right away they're just
>> > >>modes of closing a task.
>> > >>
>> > >
>> > >Exactly.
>> >
>> > I will look at fixing this. Last change for 2.92. Thanks
>>
>> Personally, I would prefer to not see Dos/Sigkill in something like
>> lSwitcher. If a normal close (or "quit", if somebody thinks that is
>> actually necessary) won't do the job, they probably should be using
>> CADH or TOP to do it. In fact, I don't see a need to have "close" or
>> "quit" either. Click the entry, to surface the program, then close, or
>> quit, as desired (or is that too complicated?).
>>
>> Sometimes, more features are just too much, and they often cause
>> unexpected problems.
>>
>> Just my C$.03...
>>
>
>I use sig-kill from lswitcher quite often.

I do also. I am leaning toward moving the kill options back to a submenu without QUIT. Please let me know if you prefer them like they are in RC_13. Thanks

Gregg


Subscribe: Feed, Digest, Index.
Unsubscribe
Mail to ListMaster