On Thu, 26 Nov 2020 13:14:08 +0100 Alfredo Fernández Díaz wrote:
>
>Hi,
>
>I think you guys misread me, or perhaps I went in too many roundabouts
>as usual,
>
>On 20/11/26 07:45, Gregg Young wrote:
>[...]
>>Mutiple lswitchers of any kind: The protection of shared memory in this
>>case
>>is non-trivial partiuarly in an SMP setting. I am unwilling to even
>>look at
>>this after it took me many months to hopefully make fat32 multiproceser
>>safe.
>>If you want to write and debug the semaphore code for this feel free to
>>do it.
>
>I don't want multiple lSwitcher widgets at all. I was trying to point
>out that instead of one globally, currently one lSwitcher widget *per
>XCenter* is allowed.
This shouldn't be true. The widget is set WGTF_UNIQUEGLOBAL which means one widget period. If you can install one on a second xcenter it is a bug in xwp.
>
>I have no doubt getting multiple such things to work would be difficult,
>and probably is useless -- but in that case, as soon as the first
>lSwitcher widget is created, the option should be grayed out in ALL
>XCenters.
It is set so it should be grayed on them all. Thanks
Gregg
>
>IIRC this should be a matter of specifying a certain widget type for
>XWP, but of course I may be wrong.
>
>Thanks
>
>
>=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
>This message is sent to you because you are subscribed to the mailing
>list <lswitcher-dev@2rosenthals.com>.
>To unsubscribe, E-mail to: <lswitcher-dev-off@2rosenthals.com>
>To switch to the DIGEST mode, E-mail to
><lswitcher-dev-digest@2rosenthals.com>
>To switch to the INDEX mode, E-mail to
><lswitcher-dev-index@2rosenthals.com>
>Send administrative queries to <lswitcher-dev-request@2rosenthals.com>
>To subscribe (new addresses), E-mail to:
><lswitcher-dev-on@2rosenthals.com> and reply to the confirmation email.
>Web archives are publicly available at: http://lists.2rosenthals.com
>
>This list is hosted by Rosenthal & Rosenthal, LLC
>P.O. Box 281, Deer Park, NY 11729-0281. Non-
>electronic communications related to content
>contained in these messages should be directed
>to the above address. (CAN-SPAM Act of 2003)
>
>=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
>
>
torna alla lista