X-UIDL: 1902 Return-Path: os2-netware_users-owner@2rosenthals.com Received: from mail.2rosenthals.com (localhost [127.0.0.1] ) by mail.2rosenthals.com (Hethmon Brothers Smtpd) ; Mon, 16 Jun 2003 23:53:04 -0500 Received: from mail1.no-ip.com (goodyear.vitalwerks.com [64.156.198.155] ) by mail.2rosenthals.com (Hethmon Brothers Smtpd) ; Mon, 16 Jun 2003 23:53:03 -0500 X-Envelope-To: Received: (qmail 29888 invoked by uid 89); 17 Jun 2003 03:52:35 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO MAIL03.toast.net) (206.244.185.10) by mail1.no-ip.com with SMTP; 17 Jun 2003 03:52:35 -0000 Received: from 2rosenthals.com (unverified [24.47.134.13]) by MAIL03.toast.net (Vircom SMTPRS 2.0.244) with ESMTP id for ; Mon, 16 Jun 2003 23:52:24 -0400 Message-ID: <3EEE909D.3010309@2rosenthals.com> Organization: Rosenthal & Rosenthal User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (OS/2; U; Warp 4.5; en-US; rv:1.3b; MultiZilla v1.4.0.4A) Gecko/20030615 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <105577571501@rfnow.com> In-Reply-To: <105577571501@rfnow.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Date: Mon, 16 Jun 2003 23:53:03 EST5EDT4,M4.1,M10.5 X-OldDate: Mon, 16 Jun 2003 23:53:01 -0400 Sender: os2-netware_users-owner X-Listname: os2-netware_users@2rosenthals.com Reply-To: os2-netware_users@2rosenthals.com From: Lewis G Rosenthal To: os2-netware_users@2rosenthals.com Subject: OS/2-NetWare Users List: IP vs IPX (was: Re: Netware IP) X-List-Unsubscribe: Send email to os2-netware_users-request@2rosenthals.com X-List-Owner: os2-netware_users-owner@2rosenthals.com I've seen them advise it to resolve slow login issues under NT, as well as other things. NW6 is the first version I've seen to actually get Btrieve performance under IP to surpass IPX (after quite a bit of tuning, believe me!). Vaughn Bender wrote: >Hi > >Actually I have seen Novell conceed that if you want speed on the wire...keep IPX > >Vaughn > >On Mon, 16 Jun 2003 10:49:45 EST5EDT4,M4.1,M10.5, Lewis G Rosenthal wrote: > > > >>I'm continually puzzled by the number of sites wanting to remove IPX >> >> >>from the wire. In all of my installations, I see no performance impact > > >>by running IPX alongside IP. I've never used compatibility mode, and as >>IPX addressing is a no-brainer, it's always seemed to be a simple matter >>of enabling IPX at install time and leaving it alone. >> >> -- Lewis --------------------------------------------------------------------- Lewis G Rosenthal, CNA Rosenthal & Rosenthal : Accountants / Network Consultants New York / Northern Virginia : www.2rosenthals.com Novell Users International : www.whytheylie.com OS/2's new face is eComStation : www.ecomstation.com --------------------------------------------------------------------- This OS/2 system (Apollo) uptime is 0 days 03:18 hours and 05 seconds =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-= To unsubscribe from this list, send a message to steward@2rosenthals.com with the command "unsubscribe os2-netware_users" in the body (omit the quotes). For help with other commands, send a message to steward@2rosenthals.com with the command "help" in the body (omit the quotes). =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=