From: "Lewis G Rosenthal" Received: from [192.168.100.201] (account lgrosenthal HELO [10.155.70.250]) by 2rosenthals.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 5.1.3) with ESMTPSA id 1708647 for os2-wireless_users@2rosenthals.com; Wed, 20 Feb 2008 20:04:43 -0500 Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: SnapperMail 2.3.7.01 by Snapperfish To: "OS/2 Wireless Users Mailing List" Subject: Re: [OS2Wireless] Genmac Installation Issue Message-ID: <4981-SnapperMsg4EDDFFFDC3E27E80@[10.155.70.250]> In-Reply-To: References: Date: Wed, 20 Feb 2008 20:00:21 -0500 Content-type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-transfer-encoding: 7bit Different versions handled the debug parameter differently. I haven't checked mine recently, but m guess is that NO or NONE are now interchangeable. As for the SSID, when using something to manage your connections (XWLAN), this parameter is irrelevant. What are the timestamps on your w29n51.??? files? Just curious. Cheers, my friend. ...... Original Message ....... On Tue, 19 Feb 2008 02:42:13 -0500 (EST) "Hakan" wrote: >Hi Lewis, > >Thank you, adding STACK32 did the trick and the system no longer traps. > The relevant portion of PROTOCOL.INI now looks like this: > >[W8086X4224_nif] > > DriverName = WRND32$ > VENDOR = 0x8086 > DEVICE = 0x4224 > NDIS_SYS = "W29N51.SYS" > NDIS_INF = "W29N51.INF" > SSID = "WLAN" > DEBUGLEVEL = "NO" > OPTIONS = "STACK32" > >I see that you have SSID = "ANY" whereas I have "WLAN" and that you >have DEBUGLEVEL = "NONE" whereas mine says "NO". Is there any >significance to the former difference? The latter I assume is the very >same setting which can be expressed in two different ways. > >Hakan > >On Sun, 17 Feb 2008 10:26:49 -0500, Lewis G Rosenthal wrote: > >>Apologies for the top post, all...just following the flow. >> >>Sorry, I've been reading this thread off and on from my handheld, >>without regard to the threading, and have been missing much of the >>discussion. My apologies, Hakan. >> >>Here's what I have in PROTOCOL.INI: >> >>[W8086X4224_nif] >> >> DriverName = WRND32$ >> VENDOR = 0x8086 >> DEVICE = 0x4224 >> NDIS_SYS = "W29N51.SYS" >> NDIS_INF = "W29N51.INF" >> SSID = "ANY" >> DEBUGLEVEL = "NONE" >> OPTIONS = "NONE" >> >>Note that I am no longer using the STACK32 option (on the OPTIONS = >>line). I believe (now that I think of it) that the requirement for it >>has to do with the version of UNIAUD in use, and the later builds of >>UNIAUD seem to play better (pardon the pun) with GenMAC than they did >>some time ago (there was a time when we couldn't get sound at all with >>GenMAC installed). >> >>So, to answer your point, and Christian's (and apologies if I've led >>everyone astray by talking off the top of my head earlier), STACK32 >>is/was necessary for the w29n51.sys driver, which did/will trap under >>older UNIAUD builds without it. However, using the newest builds of >>UNIAUD (1.1.4+), you should be fine, as above. >> >>Hakan, what was your trap, anyway? 008? (That's what I would expect, >>which would indicate an interrupt conflict.) >> >>On 02/15/08 10:03 am, Hakan thus wrote : >>> Hi Lewis, >>> >>> Where should add this statement? Thanks. >>> >>> Hakan >>> >>> On Thu, 14 Feb 2008 22:58:35 -0500, Lewis G Rosenthal wrote: >>> >>> >>>> OPTIONS = STACK32 > > > >=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-= >This message is sent to you because you are subscribed to > the mailing list . >To unsubscribe, E-mail to: >To switch to the DIGEST mode, E-mail to >To switch to the INDEX mode, E-mail to >Send administrative queries to >To subscribe (new addresses), E-mail to: and reply to the confirmation email. >Web archives are publicly available at: http://lists.2rosenthals.com > >This list is hosted by Rosenthal & Rosenthal, LLC >P.O. Box 281, Deer Park, NY 11729-0281. Non- >electronic communications related to content >contained in these messages should be directed >to the above address. (CAN-SPAM Act of 2003) > >=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-= > ___ Lewis G Rosenthal Rosenthal & Rosenthal, LLC Sent with SnapperMail