From: "Hakan" Received: from [192.168.100.201] (HELO mail.2rosenthals.com) by 2rosenthals.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 5.1.3) with ESMTP id 1709254 for os2-wireless_users@2rosenthals.com; Thu, 21 Feb 2008 12:11:03 -0500 Received-SPF: none (secmgr-ny.randr: 74.208.4.197 is neither permitted nor denied by domain of meddatainc.com) client-ip=74.208.4.197; envelope-from=agents@meddatainc.com; helo=mout.perfora.net; Received: from mout.perfora.net ([74.208.4.197]) by secmgr-ny.randr with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1JSEvy-0006Vn-4J for os2-wireless_users@2rosenthals.com; Thu, 21 Feb 2008 12:10:17 -0500 Received: from localhost ([80.187.149.7]) by mrelay.perfora.net (node=mrus1) with ESMTP (Nemesis) id 0MKpCa-1JSEvk0RK2-0007JM; Thu, 21 Feb 2008 12:09:58 -0500 To: "OS/2 Wireless Users Mailing List" Date: Thu, 21 Feb 2008 12:06:04 -0500 (EST) Reply-To: "Hakan" Priority: Normal X-Mailer: PMMail 2.20.2382 for OS/2 Warp 4.5 In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: [OS2Wireless] Genmac Installation Issue Message-Id: <0MKpCa-1JSEvk0RK2-0007JM@mrelay.perfora.net> X-Provags-ID: V01U2FsdGVkX1+vmjrCNwO3+p5DtEr7c2IGllNVjudjOev6HQs nAGnSdGpJZ8nuZE/YIBAT5j2SuyZhmJWQeskAPHcKNe9Lz1PsK Xzvb6ztSpSt/wel1uWLpw== X-Spam-Score: 0.9 (/) X-Spam-Report: 0.9 MSGID_FROM_MTA_ID Message-Id for external message added locally Lewis, 3-05-06 10:31a 2,950 0 a--- W29N51.INF 7-19-05 8:14p 3,289,088 208 a--- W29N51.SYS Same as yours? On Wed, 20 Feb 2008 20:00:21 -0500, Lewis G Rosenthal wrote: >Different versions handled the debug parameter differently. I haven't >checked mine recently, but m guess is that NO or NONE are now >interchangeable. > >As for the SSID, when using something to manage your connections (XWLAN), >this parameter is irrelevant. > >What are the timestamps on your w29n51.??? files? Just curious. > >Cheers, my friend. > >...... Original Message ....... >On Tue, 19 Feb 2008 02:42:13 -0500 (EST) "Hakan" > wrote: >>Hi Lewis, >> >>Thank you, adding STACK32 did the trick and the system no longer traps. >> The relevant portion of PROTOCOL.INI now looks like this: >> >>[W8086X4224_nif] >> >> DriverName = WRND32$ >> VENDOR = 0x8086 >> DEVICE = 0x4224 >> NDIS_SYS = "W29N51.SYS" >> NDIS_INF = "W29N51.INF" >> SSID = "WLAN" >> DEBUGLEVEL = "NO" >> OPTIONS = "STACK32" >> >>I see that you have SSID = "ANY" whereas I have "WLAN" and that you >>have DEBUGLEVEL = "NONE" whereas mine says "NO". Is there any >>significance to the former difference? The latter I assume is the very >>same setting which can be expressed in two different ways. >> >>Hakan >> >>On Sun, 17 Feb 2008 10:26:49 -0500, Lewis G Rosenthal wrote: >> >>>Apologies for the top post, all...just following the flow. >>> >>>Sorry, I've been reading this thread off and on from my handheld, >>>without regard to the threading, and have been missing much of the >>>discussion. My apologies, Hakan. >>> >>>Here's what I have in PROTOCOL.INI: >>> >>>[W8086X4224_nif] >>> >>> DriverName = WRND32$ >>> VENDOR = 0x8086 >>> DEVICE = 0x4224 >>> NDIS_SYS = "W29N51.SYS" >>> NDIS_INF = "W29N51.INF" >>> SSID = "ANY" >>> DEBUGLEVEL = "NONE" >>> OPTIONS = "NONE" >>> >>>Note that I am no longer using the STACK32 option (on the OPTIONS = >>>line). I believe (now that I think of it) that the requirement for it >>>has to do with the version of UNIAUD in use, and the later builds of >>>UNIAUD seem to play better (pardon the pun) with GenMAC than they did >>>some time ago (there was a time when we couldn't get sound at all with >>>GenMAC installed). >>> >>>So, to answer your point, and Christian's (and apologies if I've led >>>everyone astray by talking off the top of my head earlier), STACK32 >>>is/was necessary for the w29n51.sys driver, which did/will trap under >>>older UNIAUD builds without it. However, using the newest builds of >>>UNIAUD (1.1.4+), you should be fine, as above. >>> >>>Hakan, what was your trap, anyway? 008? (That's what I would expect, >>>which would indicate an interrupt conflict.) >>> >>>On 02/15/08 10:03 am, Hakan thus wrote : >>>> Hi Lewis, >>>> >>>> Where should add this statement? Thanks. >>>> >>>> Hakan >>>> >>>> On Thu, 14 Feb 2008 22:58:35 -0500, Lewis G Rosenthal wrote: >>>> >>>> >>>>> OPTIONS = STACK32 >> >> >> >>=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-= >>This message is sent to you because you are subscribed to >> the mailing list . >>To unsubscribe, E-mail to: >>To switch to the DIGEST mode, E-mail to > >>To switch to the INDEX mode, E-mail to > >>Send administrative queries to > >>To subscribe (new addresses), E-mail to: > and reply to the confirmation email. >>Web archives are publicly available at: http://lists.2rosenthals.com >> >>This list is hosted by Rosenthal & Rosenthal, LLC >>P.O. Box 281, Deer Park, NY 11729-0281. Non- >>electronic communications related to content >>contained in these messages should be directed >>to the above address. (CAN-SPAM Act of 2003) >> >>=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-= >> >___ >Lewis G Rosenthal >Rosenthal & Rosenthal, LLC >Sent with SnapperMail > >=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-= >This message is sent to you because you are subscribed to > the mailing list . >To unsubscribe, E-mail to: >To switch to the DIGEST mode, E-mail to >To switch to the INDEX mode, E-mail to >Send administrative queries to >To subscribe (new addresses), E-mail to: and reply to the confirmation email. >Web archives are publicly available at: http://lists.2rosenthals.com > >This list is hosted by Rosenthal & Rosenthal, LLC >P.O. Box 281, Deer Park, NY 11729-0281. Non- >electronic communications related to content >contained in these messages should be directed >to the above address. (CAN-SPAM Act of 2003) > >=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-= >