From: "Lewis G Rosenthal" Received: from [192.168.100.201] (account lgrosenthal HELO [10.179.144.121]) by 2rosenthals.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 5.1.3) with ESMTPSA id 1709454 for os2-wireless_users@2rosenthals.com; Thu, 21 Feb 2008 15:01:58 -0500 Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: SnapperMail 2.3.7.01 by Snapperfish To: "OS/2 Wireless Users Mailing List" Subject: Re: [OS2Wireless] Genmac Installation Issue Message-ID: <5152-SnapperMsg4EDDFFFDC3E388F4@[10.179.144.121]> In-Reply-To: References: Date: Thu, 21 Feb 2008 14:53:53 -0500 Content-type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-transfer-encoding: 7bit I don't have y machine fired up at the moment, but I know that mine are newer (2007, IIRC). I'll confirm later on. ...... Original Message ....... On Thu, 21 Feb 2008 12:06:04 -0500 (EST) "Hakan" wrote: >Lewis, > >3-05-06 10:31a 2,950 0 a--- W29N51.INF >7-19-05 8:14p 3,289,088 208 a--- W29N51.SYS > >Same as yours? > >On Wed, 20 Feb 2008 20:00:21 -0500, Lewis G Rosenthal wrote: > >>Different versions handled the debug parameter differently. I haven't >>checked mine recently, but m guess is that NO or NONE are now >>interchangeable. >> >>As for the SSID, when using something to manage your connections (XWLAN), >>this parameter is irrelevant. >> >>What are the timestamps on your w29n51.??? files? Just curious. >> >>Cheers, my friend. >> >>...... Original Message ....... >>On Tue, 19 Feb 2008 02:42:13 -0500 (EST) "Hakan" >> wrote: >>>Hi Lewis, >>> >>>Thank you, adding STACK32 did the trick and the system no longer traps. >>> The relevant portion of PROTOCOL.INI now looks like this: >>> >>>[W8086X4224_nif] >>> >>> DriverName = WRND32$ >>> VENDOR = 0x8086 >>> DEVICE = 0x4224 >>> NDIS_SYS = "W29N51.SYS" >>> NDIS_INF = "W29N51.INF" >>> SSID = "WLAN" >>> DEBUGLEVEL = "NO" >>> OPTIONS = "STACK32" >>> >>>I see that you have SSID = "ANY" whereas I have "WLAN" and that you >>>have DEBUGLEVEL = "NONE" whereas mine says "NO". Is there any >>>significance to the former difference? The latter I assume is the very >>>same setting which can be expressed in two different ways. >>> >>>Hakan >>> >>>On Sun, 17 Feb 2008 10:26:49 -0500, Lewis G Rosenthal wrote: >>> >>>>Apologies for the top post, all...just following the flow. >>>> >>>>Sorry, I've been reading this thread off and on from my handheld, >>>>without regard to the threading, and have been missing much of the >>>>discussion. My apologies, Hakan. >>>> >>>>Here's what I have in PROTOCOL.INI: >>>> >>>>[W8086X4224_nif] >>>> >>>> DriverName = WRND32$ >>>> VENDOR = 0x8086 >>>> DEVICE = 0x4224 >>>> NDIS_SYS = "W29N51.SYS" >>>> NDIS_INF = "W29N51.INF" >>>> SSID = "ANY" >>>> DEBUGLEVEL = "NONE" >>>> OPTIONS = "NONE" >>>> >>>>Note that I am no longer using the STACK32 option (on the OPTIONS = >>>>line). I believe (now that I think of it) that the requirement for it >>>>has to do with the version of UNIAUD in use, and the later builds of >>>>UNIAUD seem to play better (pardon the pun) with GenMAC than they did >>>>some time ago (there was a time when we couldn't get sound at all with >>>>GenMAC installed). >>>> >>>>So, to answer your point, and Christian's (and apologies if I've led >>>>everyone astray by talking off the top of my head earlier), STACK32 >>>>is/was necessary for the w29n51.sys driver, which did/will trap under >>>>older UNIAUD builds without it. However, using the newest builds of >>>>UNIAUD (1.1.4+), you should be fine, as above. >>>> >>>>Hakan, what was your trap, anyway? 008? (That's what I would expect, >>>>which would indicate an interrupt conflict.) >>>> >>>>On 02/15/08 10:03 am, Hakan thus wrote : >>>>> Hi Lewis, >>>>> >>>>> Where should add this statement? Thanks. >>>>> >>>>> Hakan >>>>> >>>>> On Thu, 14 Feb 2008 22:58:35 -0500, Lewis G Rosenthal wrote: >>>>> >>>>> >>>>>> OPTIONS = STACK32 >>> >>> >>> >>>=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-= >>>This message is sent to you because you are subscribed to >>> the mailing list . >>>To unsubscribe, E-mail to: >>>To switch to the DIGEST mode, E-mail to >> >>>To switch to the INDEX mode, E-mail to >> >>>Send administrative queries to >> >>>To subscribe (new addresses), E-mail to: >> and reply to the confirmation email. >>>Web archives are publicly available at: http://lists.2rosenthals.com >>> >>>This list is hosted by Rosenthal & Rosenthal, LLC >>>P.O. Box 281, Deer Park, NY 11729-0281. Non- >>>electronic communications related to content >>>contained in these messages should be directed >>>to the above address. (CAN-SPAM Act of 2003) >>> >>>=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-= >>> >>___ >>Lewis G Rosenthal >>Rosenthal & Rosenthal, LLC >>Sent with SnapperMail >> >>=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-= >>This message is sent to you because you are subscribed to >> the mailing list . >>To unsubscribe, E-mail to: >>To switch to the DIGEST mode, E-mail to >>To switch to the INDEX mode, E-mail to >>Send administrative queries to >>To subscribe (new addresses), E-mail to: and reply to the confirmation email. >>Web archives are publicly available at: http://lists.2rosenthals.com >> >>This list is hosted by Rosenthal & Rosenthal, LLC >>P.O. Box 281, Deer Park, NY 11729-0281. Non- >>electronic communications related to content >>contained in these messages should be directed >>to the above address. (CAN-SPAM Act of 2003) >> >>=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-= >> > > > >=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-= >This message is sent to you because you are subscribed to > the mailing list . >To unsubscribe, E-mail to: >To switch to the DIGEST mode, E-mail to >To switch to the INDEX mode, E-mail to >Send administrative queries to >To subscribe (new addresses), E-mail to: and reply to the confirmation email. >Web archives are publicly available at: http://lists.2rosenthals.com > >This list is hosted by Rosenthal & Rosenthal, LLC >P.O. Box 281, Deer Park, NY 11729-0281. Non- >electronic communications related to content >contained in these messages should be directed >to the above address. (CAN-SPAM Act of 2003) > >=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-= > ___ Lewis G Rosenthal Rosenthal & Rosenthal, LLC Sent with SnapperMail