From: "Dave Saville" <os2-wireless_users@2rosenthals.com>
To: "OS/2 Wireless Users Mailing List" <os2-wireless_users@2rosenthals.com>
Date: Tue, 22 Aug 2006 09:48:10 +0100 (BST)
Reply-To: "Dave Saville" <dave@deezee.org>
Priority: Normal
In-Reply-To: <list-304505@2rosenthals.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Subject: Re: [OS2Wireless]Odd routing with two NICs
Message-ID: <0035451300.00000SFI@pooh.deezee.org>

On Mon, 21 Aug 2006 20:52:37 -0400, Lewis G Rosenthal wrote:

>On 08/21/06 04:41 pm, Jeroen Besse thus wrote :
>> Maybe a dumb question... if iptrace doesn't show anything when using
>> file & print services... Is file & print services using TCP/IP? Maybe
>> it's connecting over NETBEUI, which you'll never see with iptrace!
>>
>> Best regards,
>> Jeroen Besse
>>
>I was thinking that, and then I thought, "wait a minute; this is *Dave*. 
>He's got that covered, I'm sure." :-D
>
>What you say though, Jeroen, does make perfect sense.

Thanks for the vote of confidence :-)

I just checked adapters and both interfaces have both NETBIOS *and* NETBIOS
over TCP/IP. It was a long time back, but I *think* that was because I was
trying to talk to both NT systems and Win 2K systems and one needed one and the
other the other. But I can't recall which. So I suspect it is using NETBIOS
which of course will not show up but if it were NETBIOS over TCP/IP it would
right?

Either way it does not explain the weird routing. I merely tried the trace
without thinking too hard to see what addresses might be being used.

-- 
Regards

Dave Saville