From: "Carl Gehr" Received: from mxout2.mailhop.org ([63.208.196.166] verified) by 2rosenthals.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 5.0.9) with ESMTP id 336907 for os2-wireless_users@2rosenthals.com; Wed, 06 Sep 2006 13:19:41 -0400 Received: from mxin2.mailhop.org ([63.208.196.176]) by mxout2.mailhop.org with esmtp (Exim 4.51) id 1GL13p-0009Pa-DH for os2-wireless_users@2rosenthals.com; Wed, 06 Sep 2006 13:19:39 -0400 Received: from mail-out1.fuse.net ([216.68.8.174] helo=smtp1.fuse.net) by mxin2.mailhop.org with esmtp (Exim 4.51) id 1GL13k-0008Lr-1z for os2-wireless_users@2rosenthals.com; Wed, 06 Sep 2006 13:19:32 -0400 Received: from gx4.fuse.net ([208.102.7.45]) by smtp1.fuse.net (InterMail vM.6.01.06.01 201-2131-130-101-20060113) with ESMTP id <20060906171926.TTBH12893.smtp1.fuse.net@gx4.fuse.net> for ; Wed, 6 Sep 2006 13:19:26 -0400 Received: from localhost ([208.102.7.45]) by gx4.fuse.net (InterMail vG.1.02.00.02 201-2136-104-102-20041210) with ESMTP id <20060906171926.JKMT11137.gx4.fuse.net@localhost> for ; Wed, 6 Sep 2006 13:19:26 -0400 To: "OS/2 Wireless Users Mailing List" Date: Wed, 06 Sep 2006 13:19:22 -0400 (EDT) Reply-To: "Carl Gehr" Priority: Normal X-Mailer: PMMail 2.20.2382 for OS/2 Warp 4.5 In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: [OS2Wireless]Re: eCS or OS/2 on T60 [Was: Re: Next wave of portable device architecture] Message-Id: <20060906171926.JKMT11137.gx4.fuse.net@localhost> X-Mail-Handler: MailHop by DynDNS X-Spam-Score: -2.2 (--) On Wed, 06 Sep 2006 18:01:50 +0200 (CEST), Jan van Wijk wrote: >Hi Carl, > >On Wed, 06 Sep 2006 10:28:33 -0400 (EDT), Carl Gehr wrote: > >>>I have found that for a Windows-XP that is actually USED over a longer period, >>>something like 6GB is about the minimum, unless you do a lot of tweaking and >>>removing unneeded stuff, or move lots of data to other partitions ... >>> >>>Regards, JvW >> >>In order to have anything resembling a usable Windoze2K, I had to go to >>12GB. > >Yes, but that depends on what kind of applications you have and use. > >On a dedicated machine that I use for web-browsing and photoshop only, >I have been running Windows-XP in 6GB for a few years now ... > >On my T42, that has the same plus a few other applications, and is >used more, I also have something like 12GB (which is 75 full :-) > >Regards, JvW You're probably right that 12GB is a little large. I really don't use Win2K much, primarily for updating my Palm-based Treo. I used to use it for Delorme Mapping software, but a combination of the on-line maps that have gotten so much better and a navigation system in my car, I've not done that much. Possibly one thing that makes a difference is that I restrict Windoze to ONLY its own C-Drive. So, that one partition has to include all data that Windoze will access. I do no allow access to any of my other eCS drives. If I have to move data between systems, I use a USB flash drive and wipe it clean after each use. [Paranoid? Probably. But, I refuse to take any chances.] Carl