From: "Sam Lewis" Received: from mxout1.mailhop.org ([63.208.196.165] verified) by 2rosenthals.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 5.0.9) with ESMTP id 343794 for os2-wireless_users@2rosenthals.com; Sat, 09 Sep 2006 10:12:34 -0400 Received: from mxin2.mailhop.org ([63.208.196.176]) by mxout1.mailhop.org with esmtp (Exim 4.51) id 1GM3ZM-0000MT-2H for os2-wireless_users@2rosenthals.com; Sat, 09 Sep 2006 10:12:28 -0400 Received: from cassiopeia.email.starband.net ([148.78.247.122]) by mxin2.mailhop.org with esmtp (Exim 4.51) id 1GM3ZL-0001Qq-I8 for os2-wireless_users@2rosenthals.com; Sat, 09 Sep 2006 10:12:27 -0400 Received: from [192.168.244.2] (vsat-148-63-140-148.c189.t7.mrt.starband.net [148.63.140.148]) by cassiopeia.email.starband.net (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id k89ECI7T014544 for ; Sat, 9 Sep 2006 10:12:21 -0400 Message-ID: <4502CBC6.4090603@rollanet.org> Date: Sat, 09 Sep 2006 09:12:22 -0500 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.7.11) Gecko/20050728 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: OS/2 Wireless Users Mailing List Subject: Re: [OS2Wireless]Re: Satellite providers (Was Hotspots: Play-for-Fee vs Play-for-Free) References: In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-WinProxy-AntiVirus: Passed X-WinProxy-AntiVirus-Message: Scanned by http://www.Ositis.com/WinProxy X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV version 0.86.2, clamav-milter version 0.86 on cassiopeia X-Virus-Status: Clean X-Mail-Handler: MailHop by DynDNS X-Spam-Score: -2.6 (--) Lewis G Rosenthal wrote: > On 09/07/06 07:56 pm, Sam Lewis thus wrote : > >> Lewis G Rosenthal wrote: >> >>> On 09/07/06 12:37 pm, Dunhill Satellite Systems thus wrote : >>> >>>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> For me no *doze in my network ! (or it must be a paying client) >>>> >>>> UsaSat/Surfbeam is a straight tcpip connection (also with static >>>> IP) and >>>> runs on VxWorks. >>>> >>> >>> >>> (Which is Windows, after all...) ;-) >> >> >> >> I thought VXworks was built on VRTX? I don't think there are any >> similarities between VRTX and Windoze. :) > > I stand corrected; you are closer to the truth of the matter, my > friend. My earlier impression came from some faulty data I read > concerning the latest round of LinkSys boxes (WRT54G v5) based on > VxWorks. Here's an interesting link: > http://www.xs4all.nl/~borkhuis/vxworks/vxw_pt0.html#0.1. > > Apologies for the (my) confusion. I don't see where an apology is needed for anything. I'm learning quite a bit here. And I'll read the Faq you linked. > As VxWorks is just about as ornery to deal with (as it's proprietary, > we don't have many available hacks for it What do you mean by "hacks"? Sam > - in the Wi-Fi world, at least, where I've had to interact with it), I > just started lumping it in with Windows after reading what I did > concerning the v5 LinkSys devices. > Scanned by WinProxy http://www.Ositis.com/