| Mailing List os2-wireless_users@2rosenthals.com Archived Message #1308 | 
 
 
back to list | 
| From: | 
"Rick R." <os2-wireless_users@2rosenthals.com> | 
Full Headers Undecoded message | 
 
| Subject: | 
Re: [OS2Wireless]Re: OT Bluetooth | 
 
| Date: | 
Sat, 9 Sep 2006 22:19:32 -0700 (PDT) | 
 
| To: | 
OS/2 Wireless Users Mailing List <os2-wireless_users@2rosenthals.com> | 
  
 | 
|---|
The ease of hacking into the BT stacks of phones has already been proven in scientific experiments sponsored by major Universities.
  The BT stack vulnerabillity is a scientific fact, not a matter of debate or speculation.
Lewis G Rosenthal <os2-wireless_users@2rosenthals.com> wrote:
  On 09/08/06 06:47 am, Dave Saville thus wrote :
> On Fri, 8 Sep 2006 01:57:37 -0700 (PDT), Rick R. wrote:
>
> 
>> At least on my PDA and my GPS device.
>> 
>
> That was why I was asking really - I am looking at a new GPS which has USB &
> BT. However the USB is very restricted, but people have found that BT
> connectivity gets you into the GPS file system. 
>
> 
Configured correctly, BT is quite "private" (though not encrypted). 
Devices must be "paired" to each
 other, and it is up to the user to tell 
a device to make its presence known to other devices. The original BT 
devices didn't have much flexibility in the realm of privacy, and were 
indeed quite chatty. Nowadays, though, these limitations have been 
somewhat overcome. I don't worry that people will be hacking into my 
Sony Ericsson P910i phone, just because I leave the BT on. And insofar 
as power consumption is concerned, this depends greatly upon the BT 
device itself. My phone is rather stingy on power when the BT is 
enabled, and I find that my battery takes a bigger hit from letting my 
email app "idle" (not even checking for mail every so often, but just 
running in the background!) than from leaving my BT enabled.
In short, for PANs (Personal Area Networks), Bluetooth is just great. 
For headsets, headphones, and file transfers between PDAs, BT excels far 
beyond 802.11 in ease of use and compatibility (try sending data
 from 
your sound card via 802.11...huh????) :-) The right (sized) tool for 
the right (sized) job!
Anyway, we still need a working stack, and for that, I would probably 
lean toward a port of BlueZ: http://www.bluez.org/ . IBM has its own 
*nix BT stack, called BlueDrekar, but this is not OpenSource AFAIK. I 
have no idea what it would take to port BlueZ to OS/2, but as it's the 
most popular *nix BT stack, I figure that's the best place to start 
(unless we start from scratch).
-- 
Lewis
------------------------------------------------------------
Lewis G Rosenthal, CNA, CLP, CLE
Rosenthal & Rosenthal, LLC
Accountants / Network Consultants
New York / Northern Virginia www.2rosenthals.com
eComStation Consultants www.ecomstation.com
Novell Users Int'l www.novell.com/openenterpriseserver
Need a managed Wi-Fi hotspot?
 www.hautspot.com
------------------------------------------------------------
=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
This message is sent to you because you are subscribed to
the mailing list .
To unsubscribe, E-mail to: 
To switch to the DIGEST mode, E-mail to 
To switch to the INDEX mode, E-mail to 
Send administrative queries to 
To subscribe (new addresses), E-mail to: and reply to the confirmation email.
This list is hosted by Rosenthal & Rosenthal
P.O. Box 281, Deer Park, NY 11729-0281. Non-
electronic communications related to content
contained in these messages should be directed
to the above address. (CAN-SPAM Act of
 2003)
=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
 
		
Get your email and more, right on the  new Yahoo.com