From: "Hakan" <os2-wireless_users@2rosenthals.com>
Received: from mxout4.mailhop.org ([63.208.196.168] verified)
  by 2rosenthals.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 5.0.9)
  with ESMTP id 393025 for os2-wireless_users@2rosenthals.com; Thu, 28 Sep 2006 13:38:24 -0400
Received: from mxin2.mailhop.org ([63.208.196.176])
	by mxout4.mailhop.org with esmtp (Exim 4.51)
	id 1GSzq0-000Nv3-2V
	for os2-wireless_users@2rosenthals.com; Thu, 28 Sep 2006 13:38:21 -0400
Received: from [217.160.230.41] (helo=mout.perfora.net)
	by mxin2.mailhop.org with esmtp (Exim 4.51)
	id 1GSzpz-0009JT-Tc
	for os2-wireless_users@2rosenthals.com; Thu, 28 Sep 2006 13:38:20 -0400
Received: from [70.20.163.170] (helo=progstn)
	by mrelay.perfora.net (node=mrelayus1) with ESMTP (Nemesis),
	id 0MKp2t-1GSzpy2IUx-0001uM; Thu, 28 Sep 2006 13:38:19 -0400
To: "OS/2 Wireless" <os2-wireless_users@2rosenthals.com>
Date: Thu, 28 Sep 2006 13:32:45 -0400 (EDT)
Reply-To: "Hakan" <agents@meddatainc.com>
Priority: Normal
X-Mailer: PMMail 2.20.2382 for OS/2 Warp 4.5
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Subject: 104-bit WEP Key
Message-ID: <0MKp2t-1GSzpy2IUx-0001uM@mrelay.perfora.net>
X-Provags-ID: perfora.net abuse@perfora.net login:15932942dc79fdd7ddce274cd78af770
X-Mail-Handler: MailHop by DynDNS
X-Spam-Score: -2.4 (--)

I recently came across a situation with a router that required a
104-bit WEP key.  I was told the router was a "travel" router, not
being capable of 128-bit WEP encryption.  I could not get it to work
using the assigned shorter key with eCS in 128-bit encryption mode.

If my information -- which I consider reliable -- is correct, can we
have 104-bit encryption added?