Hmm, odd that I was not able to log on but I did not investigate the
failure at the time so it might be due to some misconfiguration.
On Thu, 28 Sep 2006 20:57:53 -0700, Lewis G Rosenthal wrote:
>On 09/28/06 10:32 am, Hakan thus wrote :
>> I recently came across a situation with a router that required a
>> 104-bit WEP key. I was told the router was a "travel" router, not
>> being capable of 128-bit WEP encryption. I could not get it to work
>> using the assigned shorter key with eCS in 128-bit encryption mode.
>>
>> If my information -- which I consider reliable -- is correct, can we
>> have 104-bit encryption added?
>>
>>
>104-bit is indeed 128-bit (there is a 24-bit header, hence, 40-bit
>encryption is called 64-bit). There is no such animal as 80-bit (plus a
>24-bit header). :-)
>
>(Hopefully, my auto-responder won't bounce to the list...)
>
>--
>Lewis
>------------------------------------------------------------
>Lewis G Rosenthal, CNA, CLP, CLE
>Rosenthal & Rosenthal, LLC
>Accountants / Network Consultants
> New York / Northern Virginia www.2rosenthals.com
>eComStation Consultants www.ecomstation.com
>Novell Users Int'l www.novell.com/openenterpriseserver
>Need a managed Wi-Fi hotspot? www.hautspot.com
>------------------------------------------------------------
>
>
>=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
>This message is sent to you because you are subscribed to
> the mailing list <os2-wireless_users@2rosenthals.com>.
>To unsubscribe, E-mail to: <os2-wireless_users-off@2rosenthals.com>
>To switch to the DIGEST mode, E-mail to <os2-wireless_users-digest@2rosenthals.com>
>To switch to the INDEX mode, E-mail to <os2-wireless_users-index@2rosenthals.com>
>Send administrative queries to <os2-wireless_users-request@2rosenthals.com>
>To subscribe (new addresses), E-mail to: <os2-wireless_users-on@2rosenthals.com> and reply to the confirmation email.
>
>This list is hosted by Rosenthal & Rosenthal
>P.O. Box 281, Deer Park, NY 11729-0281. Non-
>electronic communications related to content
>contained in these messages should be directed
>to the above address. (CAN-SPAM Act of 2003)
>
>=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
>
torna alla lista