From: "Stuart Updike" <os2-wireless_users@2rosenthals.com>
Received: from mxout3.mailhop.org ([63.208.196.167] verified)
  by 2rosenthals.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 5.0.9)
  with ESMTP id 395715 for os2-wireless_users@2rosenthals.com; Fri, 29 Sep 2006 14:16:07 -0400
Received: from mxin1.mailhop.org ([63.208.196.175])
	by mxout3.mailhop.org with esmtp (Exim 4.51)
	id 1GTMu3-0009HI-Dv
	for os2-wireless_users@2rosenthals.com; Fri, 29 Sep 2006 14:16:04 -0400
Received: from elasmtp-banded.atl.sa.earthlink.net ([209.86.89.70])
	by mxin1.mailhop.org with esmtp (Exim 4.51)
	id 1GTMu3-000CnQ-9g
	for os2-wireless_users@2rosenthals.com; Fri, 29 Sep 2006 14:16:03 -0400
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws;
  s=dk20050327; d=mindspring.com;
  b=EtnuCAp3HThxN/WQv8kqGcW9ua6Q7Tdc1tP3JtbP6FkhnORXw/VxBNYo2jtHjbnC;
  h=Received:Message-ID:Date:From:User-Agent:MIME-Version:To:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding:X-ELNK-Trace:X-Originating-IP;
Received: from [70.219.83.96] (helo=[70.219.83.96])
	by elasmtp-banded.atl.sa.earthlink.net with asmtp (Exim 4.34)
	id 1GTMtt-0000S6-W6
	for os2-wireless_users@2rosenthals.com; Fri, 29 Sep 2006 14:15:58 -0400
Message-ID: <451D62FC.1030400@mindspring.com>
Date: Fri, 29 Sep 2006 13:16:28 -0500
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (OS/2; U; Warp 4.5; en-US; rv:1.8.0.6) Gecko/20060730 SeaMonkey/1.0.4
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: OS/2 Wireless Users Mailing List <os2-wireless_users@2rosenthals.com>
Subject: Re: [OS2Wireless]Re: 3G Cards - PC 5220 and Verizon
References: <list-395564@2rosenthals.com>
In-Reply-To: <list-395564@2rosenthals.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-ELNK-Trace: 981bdc70bc1884855b59645513f9ec4240683398e744b8a4105361fcef4bb0939d6799a5fb38957c350badd9bab72f9c350badd9bab72f9c350badd9bab72f9c
X-Originating-IP: 70.219.83.96
X-Mail-Handler: MailHop by DynDNS
X-Spam-Score: -2.5 (--)

Andy Willis wrote:
> What I remember from talking to Steve at Warpstock in 2004 about it 
> was that it was basically a matter of Mark debugging the card to get 
> the information needed to create a USB driver for it.  It was quite 
> awhile ago and Stu can answer this part better than I but I think the 
> card is seen as a network card and doesn't require a connection 
> manager but it could be that I forgot that or it just wasn't mentioned 
> in the conversation.
> Andy 
Hi Andy,

I believe the card is seen as a memory card, but I'll try to research 
this better before I return with my in-depth reply.

See ya,

Stu Updike
Bedford, Texas
USA