From: "Andy Willis" Received: from mxout4.mailhop.org ([63.208.196.168] verified) by 2rosenthals.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 5.0.9) with ESMTP id 398395 for os2-wireless_users@2rosenthals.com; Sat, 30 Sep 2006 19:59:47 -0400 Received: from mxin1.mailhop.org ([63.208.196.175]) by mxout4.mailhop.org with esmtp (Exim 4.51) id 1GTokC-0008kB-BT for os2-wireless_users@2rosenthals.com; Sat, 30 Sep 2006 19:59:44 -0400 Received: from wx-out-0506.google.com ([66.249.82.232]) by mxin1.mailhop.org with esmtp (Exim 4.51) id 1GTokC-000JXA-9X for os2-wireless_users@2rosenthals.com; Sat, 30 Sep 2006 19:59:44 -0400 Received: by wx-out-0506.google.com with SMTP id s6so1494658wxc for ; Sat, 30 Sep 2006 16:59:44 -0700 (PDT) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:reply-to:user-agent:mime-version:to:subject:references:in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=XqZyBCrDVL4nUPE+ZTyeHfoaof9B9tcmhR4Nm1d0qTlzq9MsPOZF2cZV9sH9/psQg5ZlCk1IPueH0Bfde89gRAsl63dRClNcrBrZckWgVAZgaiFLgVfzdLygASBbud6Ad/fpDZpKoExHe0pTvN2jAixQHMf12UDMVgIrfeEzez0= Received: by 10.70.92.14 with SMTP id p14mr8220920wxb; Sat, 30 Sep 2006 16:59:43 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ?192.168.1.88? ( [32.97.110.142]) by mx.gmail.com with ESMTP id 28sm2901345wrl.2006.09.30.16.59.42; Sat, 30 Sep 2006 16:59:43 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <451F04ED.1040102@gmail.com> Date: Sat, 30 Sep 2006 17:59:41 -0600 Reply-To: abwillis1@gmail.com User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (OS/2; U; Warp 4.5; en-US; rv:1.9a1) Gecko/20060927 SeaMonkey/1.5a MIME-Version: 1.0 To: OS/2 Wireless Users Mailing List Subject: Re: [OS2Wireless]Re: Tales of my two-day Wi-Fi workshop in Milpitas, CA References: In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mail-Handler: MailHop by DynDNS X-Spam-Score: -1.0 (-) madodel wrote: > On 09/30/06 Rick R. wrote: >> And if John Dvorak of PCMag (who had already declared OS/2 dead 5 >> minutes after Lou Gerster wrote that infamous memo) has any perception >> problems in Ontario/Canada, then tell him to meet me in Ontario, CA or >> any other part of southern California, and I'll show him how I >> administer a multi-million $ project on my OS/2 box. >> >> I just calculated some figures in my head and it turned out that the >> expense tab alone for me would be ~$2000.-- to take of from here and >> go "up there". >> And that does not include loss in pay or the medical costs for the >> heart attack the project manager is going to have if his main tech man >> decides to go AWOL on him. >> >> Since I am in a hotel here, I wouldn't even know what to do with all >> my stuff. >> So I end up driving up there, and even if I'd buy a plane ticket I >> still end up paying double for hotel room and probably rental car. >> >> I'd rather spend that $$$ on new equipment. >> >> Not to mention the pesky detail that many of my foreign co-workers >> (yes, I did encounter an OS/2 fan from India on one of my last >> projects) would have a hard time getting a visa for Canada nowadays. >> >> You choose that far away place, so now don't bitch if attendance turns >> out to be low. >> I hope it won't, but if it does then its certainly not our fault! > > Actually Stan nor I had any say in this year's location. But I at least > thought it was actually a good idea to have it in Canada for several > reasons (cost is less there, Europeans are more likely to attend a > non-US event(security nonsense and politics), and we have never had an > event in that area). Unfortunately travel has been made extremely > expensive and pretty inconvenient as well so all those reasons are less > relevant today they they were a year ago. So perhaps the days for any > conventions that can't draw almost entirely local attendance are numbered. > > But I think you miss the point entirely. If you can't make it so be it. > Stan's issue is really with people who want the entire event provided to > them without attending. There is no financial support for such an > endeavor. Warpstock has always provided the event materials online > after the event was over. But even so Warpstock doesn't need charity, > it needs people to attend. That is why it is held in different areas of > North America every year to give people a chance to attend. The easiest > way to make sure that Warpstock is located convenient to you is to put > in a bid for 2007. Without any bids the whole issue is moot. > > Mark > > > This is getting fairly off-topic here but I don't think Lewis will mind much :-) There seems to be a lot of confusion on how a site is determined. Mark mentioned "bid". Check out: http://www2.warpstock.org/about/bid_proposal.html From the bids submitted the Board makes a selection. If there is no bid submitted for New York, California, or Hawaii then it obviously can't be selected. Andy