From: "Andy Willis" Received: from mxout1.mailhop.org ([63.208.196.165] verified) by 2rosenthals.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 5.0.9) with ESMTP id 398421 for os2-wireless_users@2rosenthals.com; Sat, 30 Sep 2006 20:14:53 -0400 Received: from mxin1.mailhop.org ([63.208.196.175]) by mxout1.mailhop.org with esmtp (Exim 4.51) id 1GToyn-000PIu-S4 for os2-wireless_users@2rosenthals.com; Sat, 30 Sep 2006 20:14:50 -0400 Received: from wx-out-0506.google.com ([66.249.82.229]) by mxin1.mailhop.org with esmtp (Exim 4.51) id 1GToyn-000OMi-Jh for os2-wireless_users@2rosenthals.com; Sat, 30 Sep 2006 20:14:49 -0400 Received: by wx-out-0506.google.com with SMTP id s6so1497391wxc for ; Sat, 30 Sep 2006 17:14:49 -0700 (PDT) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:reply-to:user-agent:mime-version:to:subject:references:in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=MCQMPRRHIZmIk86WmumeEMOIWr5nPcNsVT+wkRy+/5U+doD//459/nQEqX0UbpOBT1poCm3YpD+GtTdRKXfD8sqKL6fA7BXEa2IYIPYdJZb+/n65f9gMo+iwlW1m5j3PMz1kRJh1hPgkE95qyePrzPZGJxubLluntqpCSH44b4E= Received: by 10.70.52.1 with SMTP id z1mr3523541wxz; Sat, 30 Sep 2006 17:14:48 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ?192.168.1.88? ( [32.97.110.142]) by mx.gmail.com with ESMTP id 8sm5540166wra.2006.09.30.17.14.48; Sat, 30 Sep 2006 17:14:48 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <451F0877.30508@gmail.com> Date: Sat, 30 Sep 2006 18:14:47 -0600 Reply-To: abwillis1@gmail.com User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (OS/2; U; Warp 4.5; en-US; rv:1.9a1) Gecko/20060927 SeaMonkey/1.5a MIME-Version: 1.0 To: OS/2 Wireless Users Mailing List Subject: Re: [OS2Wireless]Re: Tales of my two-day Wi-Fi workshop in Milpitas, CA References: In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mail-Handler: MailHop by DynDNS X-Spam-Score: -1.0 (-) Rick R. wrote: > Put in somewhere in the US midwest, and then its the same distance for everyone. > Denver, Phoenix, ABQ, or Dallas. > See my other post about bids: http://www2.warpstock.org/about/bid_proposal.html but Denver did not do nearly as well as I expected it would. I always thought that Denver or Kansas City would be great due to being centrally located. However, the only thing that seems to make much difference for location is whether someone can drive to it. If it is far enough to fly then it doesn't seem to matter so long as it is a pretty good airport. I would like to see a California bid as it has been a few years since it has been out there. I like a Dallas bid as I think airfares to there should be about as low as they can be from anywhere. I will be happy though for any bid and no bids would be summarily dismissed. Andy