From: "Ed Durrant" Received: from [192.168.100.201] (HELO mail.2rosenthals.com) by 2rosenthals.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 5.1.3) with ESMTP id 1871847 for os2-wireless_users@2rosenthals.com; Wed, 23 Apr 2008 03:01:57 -0400 Received-SPF: none (secmgr-ny.randr: 61.9.189.137 is neither permitted nor denied by domain of durrant.mine.nu) client-ip=61.9.189.137; envelope-from=edurrant@durrant.mine.nu; helo=nschwmtas01p.mx.bigpond.com; Received: from nschwmtas01p.mx.bigpond.com ([61.9.189.137]) by secmgr-ny.randr with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1JoYzD-00010q-T4 for os2-wireless_users@2rosenthals.com; Wed, 23 Apr 2008 03:01:57 -0400 Received: from nschwotgx03p.mx.bigpond.com ([124.176.93.212]) by nschwmtas01p.mx.bigpond.com with ESMTP id <20080423070136.KGQV14575.nschwmtas01p.mx.bigpond.com@nschwotgx03p.mx.bigpond.com> for ; Wed, 23 Apr 2008 07:01:36 +0000 Received: from [192.168.100.2] (really [124.176.93.212]) by nschwotgx03p.mx.bigpond.com with ESMTP id <20080423070135.SUPC1860.nschwotgx03p.mx.bigpond.com@[192.168.100.2]> for ; Wed, 23 Apr 2008 07:01:35 +0000 Message-ID: <480EDEBB.5050704@durrant.mine.nu> Date: Wed, 23 Apr 2008 17:01:15 +1000 User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.6 (OS/2/20070731) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: OS/2 Wireless Users Mailing List Subject: Re: [OS2Wireless] Link-Local Addresses (LLA) - Does anyone actually use them? References: In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Authentication-Info: Submitted using SMTP AUTH PLAIN at nschwotgx03p.mx.bigpond.com from [124.176.93.212] using ID edward.durrant@bigpond.com at Wed, 23 Apr 2008 07:01:35 +0000 X-RPD-ScanID: Class unknown; VirusThreatLevel unknown, RefID str=0001.0A150202.480EDED0.002D,ss=1,fgs=0 X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Spam-Report: _SUMMARY_ Lewis G Rosenthal wrote: > Prompted by a recent discussion on the T60/T61 eCS list and via PM, I > am wondering if anyone has any real experience using bogus > addresses...er...Zeroconf...er...Automatic Private IP Addresses (in > Micro$oft-speak)? > > A couple Wikipedia links of interest, and the real meat and potatoes: > > http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Link-local_address > http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Automatic_Private_IP_Addressing > http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc3927 > > Personally, I stay away from these things, but I do know some Mac > users who participate in wireless peer networks and who do use them > successfully. Naturally, the IPv6 implementation doesn't have much use > for us at this point in time (as OS/2 does not ahve an IPv6-aware IP > stack!), but XWLAN does have the ability to use them and eCS 2.0 RC4 > seems to have an interesting entry in SETUP.CMD called "llaecs" (see > http://ewiki.ecomstation.nl/ecomstation20rc4whatsnew ). > > TIA > I believe another name for this is APIPA. This kicks in when there is no DHCP server available on a network and you have not configured a static IP address. It defaults to using a class B (i.e. 255.255.0.0) range starting with 169.254.0.1 and going up to 169.254.255.254 it is a random selection. As far as I know this is mainly of use on private networks as without static data or DHCP systems don't know where to find the gateway to get out to other networks such as the internet. I'm not sure if OS/2 has support for this or not - it may have as it is an approved standard - not just an M$ thing. Cheers/2 Ed.