From: "Carl Gehr" Received: from mxout2.mailhop.org ([63.208.196.166] verified) by 2rosenthals.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 5.0.9) with ESMTP id 422141 for os2-wireless_users@2rosenthals.com; Tue, 10 Oct 2006 21:38:34 -0400 Received: from mxin1.mailhop.org ([63.208.196.175]) by mxout2.mailhop.org with esmtp (Exim 4.51) id 1GXT2q-0001yF-V9 for os2-wireless_users@2rosenthals.com; Tue, 10 Oct 2006 21:38:15 -0400 Received: from mail-out1.fuse.net ([216.68.8.174] helo=smtp1.fuse.net) by mxin1.mailhop.org with esmtp (Exim 4.51) id 1GXT2q-000JM6-I2 for os2-wireless_users@2rosenthals.com; Tue, 10 Oct 2006 21:38:04 -0400 Received: from gx5.fuse.net ([208.102.7.45]) by smtp1.fuse.net (InterMail vM.6.01.06.01 201-2131-130-101-20060113) with ESMTP id <20061011013754.KDAW26726.smtp1.fuse.net@gx5.fuse.net> for ; Tue, 10 Oct 2006 21:37:54 -0400 Received: from localhost ([208.102.7.45]) by gx5.fuse.net (InterMail vG.1.02.00.02 201-2136-104-102-20041210) with ESMTP id <20061011013754.STDB5373.gx5.fuse.net@localhost> for ; Tue, 10 Oct 2006 21:37:54 -0400 To: "OS/2 Wireless Users List" Date: Tue, 10 Oct 2006 21:37:51 -0400 (EDT) Reply-To: "Carl Gehr" Priority: Normal X-Mailer: PMMail 2.20.2382 for OS/2 Warp 4.5 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Subject: [OS2Wireless] OT(?): ThinkVantage? Access Connections Message-Id: <20061011013754.STDB5373.gx5.fuse.net@localhost> X-Mail-Handler: MailHop by DynDNS X-Spam-Score: -2.6 (--) This may be somewhat OT, but I just happened upon this on the IBM/Lenovo site: "ThinkVantage? Access Connections" >http://www.pc.ibm.com/us/think/thinkvantagetech/accessconnections.html "Avoid support costs by allowing users to seamlessly switch between wired and wireless environments, managing security settings, printers, home page and other location-specific settings automatically." It also says: "Access Connections works with Microsoft Windows XP and 2000 and is conveniently installed on all new ThinkPad=AE notebooks." Anyone seen or tried this? To those of you who understand such technical details: Any chance of taking advantage of some of this to port something similar for OS/2? It would surely respond to a number of the questions that have appeared here. Carl