From: "Christian Langanke" Received: from mxout4.mailhop.org ([63.208.196.168] verified) by 2rosenthals.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 5.0.9) with ESMTP id 423044 for os2-wireless_users@2rosenthals.com; Wed, 11 Oct 2006 07:42:51 -0400 Received: from mxin1.mailhop.org ([63.208.196.175]) by mxout4.mailhop.org with esmtp (Exim 4.51) id 1GXcU4-000F6h-IU for os2-wireless_users@2rosenthals.com; Wed, 11 Oct 2006 07:42:49 -0400 Received: from server02.proxy.hosteurope.de ([80.237.136.3]) by mxin1.mailhop.org with esmtp (Exim 4.51) id 1GXcU4-0002tQ-51 for os2-wireless_users@2rosenthals.com; Wed, 11 Oct 2006 07:42:48 -0400 Received: from server02.webmailer.hosteurope.de ([10.9.0.181]) by server02.proxy.hosteurope.de with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1GXcTx-0004Ab-QB for os2-wireless_users@2rosenthals.com; Wed, 11 Oct 2006 13:42:41 +0200 Received: from nobody by server02.webmailer.hosteurope.de with local (Exim 3.36 #1 (Debian)) id 1GXcTx-0001zT-00 for ; Wed, 11 Oct 2006 13:42:41 +0200 X-submitted-by: 213.61.155.186 using webmailer.hosteurope.de/HTTP at Wed, 11 Oct 2006 13:42:41 +0200 (CEST) Received: from 213.61.155.186 (SquirrelMail authenticated user wp43877-cla) by webmailer.hosteurope.de with HTTP; Wed, 11 Oct 2006 13:42:41 +0200 (CEST) Message-ID: <43877.36318.213.61.155.186.1160566961.squirrel@webmailer.hosteurope.de> In-Reply-To: References: Date: Wed, 11 Oct 2006 13:42:41 +0200 (CEST) Subject: Re: [OS2Wireless]OT(?): ThinkVantage? Access Connections To: "OS/2 Wireless Users Mailing List" Reply-To: cla@clanganke.de User-Agent: SquirrelMail/1.4.8 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain;charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) Importance: Normal X-Mail-Handler: MailHop by DynDNS X-Spam-Score: -1.9 (-) > This may be somewhat OT, but I just happened upon this on the > IBM/Lenovo site: > "ThinkVantage? Access Connections" >>http://www.pc.ibm.com/us/think/thinkvantagetech/accessconnections.html > Anyone seen or tried this? To those of you who understand such > technical details: Any chance of taking advantage of some of this to > port something similar for OS/2? It would surely respond to a number > of the questions that have appeared here. > > Carl Hey Carl, thank you for the hint! Reviewing this solution could give more ideas on what could make sense to implement with XWLAN, and on better usability of course. But, please don't mind, your idea of a port seems somewhat funny to me. I mean, there is no way at all to even get old OS/2 source code of IBM (like the old genprism drivers, which could greatly use some maintenance), so why should we expect to get source code for to port a windows solution? Let's just deal with what we have and what we could add to that (and rememebr, only a few persons can do that). XWLAN has already connection profile support, and can execute scripts if a given WLAN connection has been established. What I see that is currently not available is: (a) a central SW component taking care not only for wireless conenctions, but for cabled as well, so a "Network Monitor" or whatever it woul be called - XWLAN and Internet Assistant can be seen as a subset of such a larger concept. If this was to include to switch automatically to a faster connection to the same network, this would require (b) first. (b) automatic detection of a cabled connection or unplug of a network cable - this makes sense only if all (or at least most of the) NDIS drivers are Genmac drivers only. The NDIS spec V2.x of OS/2 native drivers is way too old for this, the connect status can only be determined with Genmac supported devices (NDIS spec V5.x).It would make sense to research how many of the NICs being used are already Genmac driven. This number should increase again with the upcoming Genmac release for XWLAN 3.00 ! (c) setup more TCP/IP config items and perhaps app settings (such as proxy settings in Mozilla & Co) - can be done, but would require extra GUIs (like Internet Assistant offers to configure DNS and routing when setting up dial-in / DSL access) (d) a nice GUI allowing to deine what to do on connect and/or disconnect - a script is good for power users only. Requires much more time though... I would certainly like to have every single thing of that list (of course instantly and for free ;-) ), but getting this all requires a huge effort (especially (a)) and will cost a lot of time. And as far as I see it, the persons being able to create such a large solution, are already busy keeping up with the current ans smaller solutions that we already have and would like to have. I expect that for now only some additional features can be implemented (depending on the feature, of course). So I would like to invite everybody to ask for things that you really need and I likely can implement quickly. Be assured that I would love to see more featurs in XWLAN that improve usability. The automated switching between connections by fastest speed unfortunately is still out of scope because of (b), at least for the near future. bye, Christian ------------------------------------------------- Christian Langanke COS2E & CWSE Team OS/2 Ruhr e.V. cla@clanganke.de