From: "Carl Gehr" Received: from mxout3.mailhop.org ([63.208.196.167] verified) by 2rosenthals.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 5.0.9) with ESMTP id 424058 for os2-wireless_users@2rosenthals.com; Wed, 11 Oct 2006 13:52:43 -0400 Received: from mxin2.mailhop.org ([63.208.196.176]) by mxout3.mailhop.org with esmtp (Exim 4.51) id 1GXiFk-000BM2-Oa for os2-wireless_users@2rosenthals.com; Wed, 11 Oct 2006 13:52:42 -0400 Received: from mail-out1.fuse.net ([216.68.8.174] helo=smtp1.fuse.net) by mxin2.mailhop.org with esmtp (Exim 4.51) id 1GXiFf-000HCB-Cs for os2-wireless_users@2rosenthals.com; Wed, 11 Oct 2006 13:52:19 -0400 Received: from gx6.fuse.net ([208.102.7.45]) by smtp1.fuse.net (InterMail vM.6.01.06.01 201-2131-130-101-20060113) with ESMTP id <20061011175209.MBMS26726.smtp1.fuse.net@gx6.fuse.net> for ; Wed, 11 Oct 2006 13:52:09 -0400 Received: from localhost ([208.102.7.45]) by gx6.fuse.net (InterMail vG.1.02.00.02 201-2136-104-102-20041210) with ESMTP id <20061011175209.IEFP10743.gx6.fuse.net@localhost> for ; Wed, 11 Oct 2006 13:52:09 -0400 To: "OS/2 Wireless Users Mailing List" Date: Wed, 11 Oct 2006 13:52:06 -0400 (EDT) Reply-To: "Carl Gehr" Priority: Normal X-Mailer: PMMail 2.20.2382 for OS/2 Warp 4.5 In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: [OS2Wireless]Re: OT(?): ThinkVantage? Access Connections Message-Id: <20061011175209.IEFP10743.gx6.fuse.net@localhost> X-Mail-Handler: MailHop by DynDNS X-Spam-Score: -2.6 (--) On Wed, 11 Oct 2006 13:42:41 +0200 (CEST), Christian Langanke wrote: > >But, please don't mind, your idea of a port seems somewhat funny to me. Certainly, I understand all your comments... 1) I was really using the word 'port' in a VERY generic way; really only thinking of porting 'function' and/or 'ideas' not 'code'. 2) I think I was actually a little bit successful in my attempt to get some ideas on the table for others who are capable of *doing* this kind of thing. [I am absolutely *not* such an individual.] If the original posting triggered a 'maybe I could do that...,' it was worth my time to do so. And, just for the record, I would personally be willing to pay real money for many functions like this. I DO appreciate the work that you and so many others do to make eCS usable for those of us who are not competent to do it for ourselves. I appreciate the fact that a lot of these tools are 'free' to us 'sponges.' I know it is not 'free' to you who produce them. So... THANK YOU VERY MUCH FOR ALL YOUR EFFORTS! Carl